Viale Agnes, Li Juan, Tiesman Jay, Hester Susan, Massimi Aldo, Griffin Chandi, Grills George, Khitrov Greg, Lilley Kathryn, Knudtson Kevin, Ward Bill, Kornacker Karl, Chu Chin-Yi, Auer Herbert, Brooks Andrew I
Bionomics Research and Technology Center, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey 08857, USA.
J Biomol Tech. 2007 Jul;18(3):150-61.
Microarrays have revolutionized many areas of biology due to our technical ability to quantify tens of thousands of transcripts within a single experiment. However, there are still many areas that cannot benefit from this technology due to the amount of biological material needed for microarray analysis. In response to this demand, chemistries have been developed that boast the capability of generating targets from nanogram amounts of total RnA, reflecting minimal amounts of biological material, on the order of several hundred or thousand cells. Herein, we describe the evaluation of four chemistries for RnA amplification in terms of reproducibility, sensitivity, accuracy, and comparability to results from a single round of T7 amplification. No evidence for false-positive measurements of differential expression was observed. In contrast, clear differences between chemistries in sensitivity and accuracy were detected. PCR validation showed an interaction of probe sequence on the array and target labeling chemistry, resulting in a chemistry-dependent probe set sensitivity varying over an order of magnitude.
由于我们具备在单个实验中对成千上万种转录本进行定量的技术能力,微阵列已经彻底改变了生物学的许多领域。然而,由于微阵列分析所需的生物材料数量,仍有许多领域无法从这项技术中受益。为了满足这一需求,已经开发出了一些化学方法,这些方法能够从纳克量的总RNA中生成靶标,反映出极少量的生物材料,数量约为几百或几千个细胞。在此,我们根据可重复性、灵敏度、准确性以及与一轮T7扩增结果的可比性,描述了对四种RNA扩增化学方法的评估。未观察到差异表达假阳性测量的证据。相比之下,检测到化学方法在灵敏度和准确性上存在明显差异。PCR验证显示阵列上的探针序列与靶标标记化学方法之间存在相互作用,导致化学方法依赖的探针集灵敏度在一个数量级范围内变化。