Keskinbora Kader, Pekel Ali Ferit, Aydinli Isik
Department of Anesthesiology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Aug;34(2):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.11.013. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
Neuropathic cancer pain represents a major challenge. Treatment often requires adjuvant analgesics, including gabapentin, to complement the effects of opioids. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of gabapentin combined with an opioid versus opioid monotherapy for the management of neuropathic cancer pain. Seventy-five cancer patients who were receiving opioid therapy and reported sufficient pain relief of nociceptive, but not neuropathic, pain were enrolled. Sixty-three patients completed the study. Patients were randomized to one of the following treatment protocols: 1) gabapentin adjuvant to ongoing opioid treatment titrated according to pain response while opioid dose was kept constant (group GO), and 2) continuation of opioid monotherapy according to the World Health Organization treatment ladder approach (group OO). Changes in pain intensity, allodynia, and analgesic drug consumption were evaluated at Day 4 and Day 13. Side effects were also recorded. Both treatments resulted in a significant reduction of pain intensity at Day 4 and Day 13 compared to baseline. However, mean pain intensity for burning and shooting pain was significantly higher in the OO group compared to the GO group at both the fourth (P=0.0001) and 13th (P=0.0001) days of the study. An earlier significant decrease (at Day 4, P=0.002) was observed for allodynia in the GO group compared to the OO group. The rate of side effects in the GO group was significantly lower than that in the OO group (P=0.015). These data suggest that gabapentin added to an opioid provides better relief of neuropathic pain in cancer patients than opioid monotherapy; this combination of gabapentin and an opioid may represent a potential first-line regimen for the management of pain in these patients.
神经性癌痛是一项重大挑战。治疗通常需要辅助镇痛药,包括加巴喷丁,以补充阿片类药物的效果。本研究旨在比较加巴喷丁联合阿片类药物与阿片类药物单一疗法治疗神经性癌痛的有效性和安全性。75名正在接受阿片类药物治疗且报告伤害性疼痛(而非神经性疼痛)得到充分缓解的癌症患者被纳入研究。63名患者完成了研究。患者被随机分配至以下治疗方案之一:1)在持续阿片类药物治疗的基础上加用加巴喷丁,并根据疼痛反应进行滴定,同时保持阿片类药物剂量不变(GO组),以及2)根据世界卫生组织治疗阶梯方法继续进行阿片类药物单一疗法(OO组)。在第4天和第13天评估疼痛强度、痛觉过敏和镇痛药消耗量的变化。同时记录副作用。与基线相比,两种治疗在第4天和第13天均导致疼痛强度显著降低。然而,在研究的第4天(P = 0.0001)和第13天(P = 0.0001),OO组的灼痛和刺痛的平均疼痛强度均显著高于GO组。与OO组相比,GO组在第4天痛觉过敏出现了更早的显著下降(P = 0.002)。GO组的副作用发生率显著低于OO组(P = 0.015)。这些数据表明,在阿片类药物基础上加用加巴喷丁比阿片类药物单一疗法能更好地缓解癌症患者的神经性疼痛;加巴喷丁与阿片类药物的这种联合可能是这些患者疼痛管理的潜在一线治疗方案。