Suppr超能文献

医院清洁方法的微生物学评估。

A microbiological evaluation of hospital cleaning methods.

作者信息

White Liza F, Dancer Stephanie J, Robertson Chris

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Health Res. 2007 Aug;17(4):285-95. doi: 10.1080/09603120701372433.

Abstract

Hospital hygiene may be associated with hospital-acquired infection. This study evaluated four hospital cleaning methods: 'mop and vacuum', 'spray clean' and 'wet scrub' for floors, and one steam cleaning method for curtains. A standardised microbiological screening method was used to sample the environment before and after cleaning in order to quantify total viable counts as well as identify specific organisms. The results showed that all floor cleaning methods reduced the overall microbial load, although high counts and bacterial pathogens occasionally persisted despite cleaning. Spray cleaning gave marginally better results than traditional mopping and vacuuming. Wet scrubbing significantly reduced levels of coagulase-positive staphylococci (p = 0.03), which, in combination with routine methods, produced an effect that persisted for at least a week. Steam cleaning of curtains also reduced microbial counts (p = 0.08), but had little effect on Staphylococcus aureus and other potential pathogens. These results might help managers assess the costs of different cleaning methods against potential infection control benefits in a hospital.

摘要

医院卫生状况可能与医院获得性感染有关。本研究评估了四种医院清洁方法:用于地面的“拖把和吸尘”、“喷雾清洁”和“湿擦洗”,以及用于窗帘的一种蒸汽清洁方法。采用标准化的微生物筛查方法在清洁前后对环境进行采样,以量化总活菌数并鉴定特定微生物。结果表明,所有地面清洁方法都降低了总体微生物负荷,尽管清洁后仍偶尔存在高菌数和细菌病原体。喷雾清洁的效果略优于传统的拖把和吸尘。湿擦洗显著降低了凝固酶阳性葡萄球菌的水平(p = 0.03),与常规方法相结合,产生的效果至少持续一周。窗帘的蒸汽清洁也减少了微生物数量(p = 0.08),但对金黄色葡萄球菌和其他潜在病原体影响不大。这些结果可能有助于管理人员根据医院潜在的感染控制效益评估不同清洁方法的成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验