Geddes J R, Freemantle N, Mason J, Eccles M P, Boynton J
University of Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK, OX3 7JK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2006(3):CD001851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001851.pub2.
The relatively new class of antidepressant, the selective serotonin reputake inhibitors (SSRIs), may be better tolerated than the older tricyclic antidepressants. This review compares the efficacy of SSRIs with other antidepressants.
To examine the relative efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) compared to other antidepressants.
The search strategy included a search of (a) Electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE); (b) reference lists of related reviews (c) reference lists of all located studies (d) contact with the manufacturer and (e) the Cochrane Group register of controlled trials
Randomised controlled trials comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with other kinds of antidepressants in the treatment of patients with depressive disorders. The outcome measures assessed included measures of the severity of depression.
Data were collected from each study the main outcome measurefrom each study. These included: mean Hamilton depression rating scale, mean Montgomery & Asberg depression rating scale, Clinical Global Impression rating scale. An analysis of standardised mean difference of these scales was performed using Review Manager 3.1 software. The presence of heterogeneity of treatment effect was assessed
Ninety-eight trials contributed data to the analysis of the relative efficacy of SSRIs and related drugs with comparator antidepressants (Figure 3 & Appendix 3). Analysis of efficacy was based upon 5044 patients treated with an SSRI or related drug, and 4510 treated with an alternative antidepressant. The standardised effect size for SSRIs and related drugs together versus alternative antidepressants using a fixed effects model was 0.035 (95% CI -0.006 to 0.076; Q = 149.25, df = 97, p < 0.001).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are no clinically significant differences in effectiveness between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. Treatment decisions need to be based on considerations of relative patient acceptability, toxicity and cost.
相对较新的一类抗抑郁药,即选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs),可能比旧的三环类抗抑郁药耐受性更好。本综述比较了SSRIs与其他抗抑郁药的疗效。
研究选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)相对于其他抗抑郁药的相对疗效。
检索策略包括:(a)电子书目数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE);(b)相关综述的参考文献列表;(c)所有检索到的研究的参考文献列表;(d)与制造商联系;(e)Cochrane对照试验协作网注册库
比较选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与其他类型抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症患者的随机对照试验。评估的结局指标包括抑郁严重程度的测量指标。
从每项研究中收集数据,即每项研究的主要结局指标。这些指标包括:汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表均值、蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表均值、临床总体印象评定量表。使用Review Manager 3.1软件对这些量表的标准化均值差进行分析。评估治疗效果异质性的存在情况。
98项试验为SSRIs及相关药物与对照抗抑郁药相对疗效的分析提供了数据(图3和附录3)。疗效分析基于5044例接受SSRI或相关药物治疗的患者以及4510例接受其他抗抑郁药治疗 的患者。使用固定效应模型,SSRIs及相关药物与其他抗抑郁药相比的标准化效应量为0.035(95%可信区间 -0.006至0.076;Q = 149.25,自由度 = 97,p < 0.001)。
选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类抗抑郁药在疗效上无临床显著差异。治疗决策需基于患者相对可接受性、毒性和成本等因素的考量。