Dinant Christoffel, de Jager Martijn, Essers Jeroen, van Cappellen Wiggert A, Kanaar Roland, Houtsmuller Adriaan B, Vermeulen Wim
Department of Pathology, Josephine Nefkens Institute, ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Cell Sci. 2007 Aug 1;120(Pt 15):2731-40. doi: 10.1242/jcs.004523.
Live cell studies of DNA repair mechanisms are greatly enhanced by new developments in real-time visualization of repair factors in living cells. Combined with recent advances in local sub-nuclear DNA damage induction procedures these methods have yielded detailed information on the dynamics of damage recognition and repair. Here we analyze and discuss the various types of DNA damage induced in cells by three different local damage induction methods: pulsed 800 nm laser irradiation, Hoechst 33342 treatment combined with 405 nm laser irradiation and UV-C (266 nm) laser irradiation. A wide variety of damage was detected with the first two methods, including pyrimidine dimers and single- and double-strand breaks. However, many aspects of the cellular response to presensitization by Hoechst 33342 and subsequent 405 nm irradiation were aberrant from those to every other DNA damaging method described here or in the literature. Whereas, application of low-dose 266 nm laser irradiation induced only UV-specific DNA photo-lesions allowing the study of the UV-C-induced DNA damage response in a user-defined area in cultured cells.
活细胞中DNA修复机制的研究因活细胞中修复因子实时可视化的新进展而得到极大加强。结合局部亚核DNA损伤诱导程序的最新进展,这些方法已产生了关于损伤识别和修复动力学的详细信息。在这里,我们分析和讨论通过三种不同的局部损伤诱导方法在细胞中诱导的各种类型的DNA损伤:800 nm脉冲激光照射、Hoechst 33342处理结合405 nm激光照射和UV-C(266 nm)激光照射。前两种方法检测到了多种损伤,包括嘧啶二聚体以及单链和双链断裂。然而,细胞对Hoechst 33342预敏化和随后405 nm照射的反应在许多方面与本文所述或文献中描述的其他DNA损伤方法的反应不同。而低剂量266 nm激光照射仅诱导紫外线特异性DNA光损伤,从而能够在培养细胞的用户定义区域研究UV-C诱导的DNA损伤反应。