Tuiskula-Haavisto M, Vilkki J
Biotechnology and Food Research, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen, Finland.
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;117(1-4):305-12. doi: 10.1159/000103192.
Reciprocal effects for sexual maturity, egg production, egg quality traits and viability are well known in poultry crosses. They have been used in an optimal way to form profitable production hybrids. These effects have been hypothesized to originate from sex-linked genes, maternal effects or a combination of both. However, these may not be the only explanations for reciprocal effects. Recent mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) has revealed autosomal areas with parent-of-origin specific effects in the chicken. In mammals, parental imprinting, i.e. the specifically regulated expression of either maternal or paternal allele in the offspring, is the main cause of such effects. The most commonly accepted hypothesis for the origin of imprinting, the conflict hypothesis, assumes a genetic conflict of interest between the maternal and paternal genomes regarding the allocation of resources to the offspring. It also intrinsically implies that imprinting should not occur in oviparous taxa. However, new molecular genetic information has raised a need to review the possible involvement of imprinting or some related phenomena as a putative cause of reciprocal effects in poultry. Comparative mapping provides strong evidence for the conservation of orthologous imprinted gene clusters on chicken macrochromosomes. Furthermore, these gene clusters exhibit asynchronous DNA replication, an epigenetic mark specific for all imprinted regions. It has been proposed that these intrinsic chromosomal properties have been important for the evolution of imprinted gene expression in the mammalian lineage. Many of the mapped parent-of-origin specific QTL effects in chicken locate in or close to these conserved regions that show some of the basic features involved in monoallelic expression. If monoallelic expression in these regions would be observed in birds, the actual mechanism and cause may be different from the imprinting that evolved later in the mammalian lineage. In this review we discuss recent molecular genetic results that may provide tools for understanding of reciprocal differences in poultry breeding and the evolution of imprinting.
在禽类杂交中,性成熟、产蛋量、蛋品质性状和活力的互作效应是众所周知的。它们已被以最佳方式用于培育盈利性生产杂种。这些效应被推测源于性连锁基因、母体效应或两者的组合。然而,这些可能并不是互作效应的唯一解释。最近对数量性状基因座(QTL)的定位揭示了鸡中具有亲本来源特异性效应的常染色体区域。在哺乳动物中,亲本印记,即后代中母本或父本等位基因的特异性调控表达,是此类效应的主要原因。关于印记起源最被广泛接受的假说是冲突假说,该假说假定母本和父本基因组在向后代分配资源方面存在遗传利益冲突。它还内在地意味着印记不应发生在卵生类群中。然而,新的分子遗传信息引发了对审查印记或一些相关现象作为家禽互作效应可能原因的必要性。比较图谱为鸡大染色体上直系同源印记基因簇的保守性提供了有力证据。此外,这些基因簇表现出异步DNA复制,这是所有印记区域特有的一种表观遗传标记。有人提出这些内在的染色体特性对哺乳动物谱系中印记基因表达的进化很重要。鸡中许多已定位的亲本来源特异性QTL效应位于这些保守区域内或附近,这些区域显示出单等位基因表达所涉及的一些基本特征。如果在鸟类中观察到这些区域的单等位基因表达,其实际机制和原因可能与后来在哺乳动物谱系中进化出的印记不同。在本综述中,我们讨论了最近的分子遗传结果,这些结果可能为理解家禽育种中的互作差异和印记进化提供工具。