Wilson Patricia M, Kendall Sally, Brooks Fiona
School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2007 Sep;15(5):426-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00701.x.
Self-care is seen as a key element in managing resource demand in chronic disease and is also perceived as an empowering right for patients. The Chronic Disease Self-Management Programme developed in the USA has been adopted in a number of countries and in the UK has been as adapted as the Expert Patients Programme. However, despite its potential as a lay-led empowering initiative, the Expert Patients Programme has been criticised as perpetuating the medical model and failing to reach those in most need. This paper revisits a critique of the Expert Patients Programme, and drawing upon a qualitative study seeks to explore whether the Expert Patients Programme enables empowerment or replicates traditional patterns of the patient-professional relationship. A grounded-theory approach was adopted utilising focus groups, in-depth interviews and participant observation. Data were analysed through the constant comparative method and the development of codes and categories. Conducted in the relatively affluent area of the south-east of England, this paper draws on data from 66 individuals with a chronic illness who were knowledgeable, active and informed. The study revealed a number of characteristics common to expert patients that were linked to a systematic, proactive and organised approach to self-management, a clear communication style and the ability to compartmentalise emotion. The study included participant observation of an Expert Patients Programme and a professional-led self-management course. The paradoxical nature of the Expert Patients Programme was revealed, for whilst there was evidence that it reinforced the medical paradigm, there was a concurrent acknowledgement and support for the subjective experience of living with a long-term condition. Furthermore, whilst the policy emphasis has been on individual empowerment within the Expert Patients Programme, there is some evidence that it may be triggering a health consumer movement.
自我护理被视为慢性病资源需求管理的关键要素,也被视为患者的一项赋权权利。美国开发的慢性病自我管理项目已在多个国家采用,在英国则改编为“专家患者项目”。然而,尽管“专家患者项目”有潜力成为由非专业人员主导的赋权举措,但它却受到批评,被指延续了医学模式,未能惠及最需要的人群。本文重新审视对“专家患者项目”的批评,并基于一项定性研究,探讨“专家患者项目”是促成了赋权,还是复制了医患关系的传统模式。采用扎根理论方法,运用焦点小组、深度访谈和参与观察。通过持续比较法以及编码和分类的发展对数据进行分析。本文以英格兰东南部相对富裕地区为背景,借鉴了66名患有慢性病、知识渊博、积极主动且消息灵通的个体的数据。研究揭示了专家患者的一些共同特征,这些特征与自我管理的系统、积极主动和有条理的方法、清晰的沟通方式以及情绪分类能力有关。该研究包括对“专家患者项目”和专业人员主导的自我管理课程的参与观察。研究揭示了“专家患者项目”的矛盾性质,因为虽然有证据表明它强化了医学范式,但同时也承认并支持长期患病的主观体验。此外,虽然政策重点一直是“专家患者项目”中的个人赋权,但有证据表明它可能正在引发一场健康消费者运动。