Machado C J, Bachevalier J
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX, USA.
Neuroscience. 2007 Sep 7;148(3):599-611. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.06.035. Epub 2007 Aug 10.
Studying the neural mechanisms underlying complex goal-directed behaviors, such as social behavior, reward seeking or punishment avoidance, has become increasingly tractable in humans, nonhuman primates and rodents. In most experiments, however, goal-directed behaviors are measured in a laboratory setting, which is vastly different from the context in which these behaviors naturally occur. This study adapted a reward assessment paradigm, previously conducted with rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in the controlled environment of a Wisconsin General Testing Apparatus (WGTA) [Machado CJ, Bachevalier J (2007) The effects of selective amygdala, orbital frontal cortex or hippocampal formation lesions on reward assessment in nonhuman primates. Eur J Neurosci 25:2885-2904], to a more naturalistic context. We used this new paradigm to examine the effects of bilateral amygdaloid, hippocampal or orbital frontal cortex lesions on established food and nonfood preferences. Behavioral modification following reinforcer devaluation was also measured. Consistent with our previous study, none of the lesions produced changes in preference for palatable foods relative to pre-surgery, but animals with amygdala lesions displayed heightened preference for unpalatable foods that control or other operated animals typically avoided. In contrast to several previous WGTA-based experiments, nonfood preference was not affected by any of the lesions. Finally, animals with orbital frontal cortex lesions continued to select preferred foods after satiation, but those with amygdala, hippocampal or sham lesions altered their foraging behavior appropriately and selected less of the sated food. These findings parallel food devaluation results obtained with these same animals when tested in the WGTA. Overall, this study stresses the importance of testing context when measuring decision-making abilities in nonhuman primates with selective brain lesions.
研究诸如社会行为、寻求奖励或避免惩罚等复杂目标导向行为背后的神经机制,在人类、非人灵长类动物和啮齿动物中已变得越来越易于处理。然而,在大多数实验中,目标导向行为是在实验室环境中测量的,这与这些行为自然发生的背景有很大不同。本研究将一种先前在威斯康星通用测试设备(WGTA)的受控环境中对恒河猴(猕猴)进行的奖励评估范式[马查多CJ,巴谢瓦利埃J(2007年)选择性杏仁核、眶额叶皮质或海马结构损伤对非人灵长类动物奖励评估的影响。《欧洲神经科学杂志》25:2885 - 2904]应用于更自然的环境中。我们使用这种新范式来检查双侧杏仁核、海马或眶额叶皮质损伤对既定食物和非食物偏好的影响。还测量了强化物贬值后的行为改变。与我们之前的研究一致,相对于手术前,没有一种损伤会导致对美味食物的偏好发生变化,但杏仁核损伤的动物对控制组或其他手术动物通常会避开的不可口食物表现出更高的偏好。与之前基于WGTA的几个实验不同,非食物偏好不受任何一种损伤的影响。最后,眶额叶皮质损伤的动物在饱足后仍继续选择偏好的食物,但杏仁核、海马或假手术损伤的动物会适当地改变它们的觅食行为,选择较少的饱足食物。这些发现与这些相同动物在WGTA中测试时获得的食物贬值结果相似。总体而言,本研究强调了在测量有选择性脑损伤的非人灵长类动物的决策能力时测试背景的重要性。