Gomes Sabrina Carvalho, Varela Carolina Cauduro, da Veiga Sandra Leal, Rösing Cassiano Kuchenbecker, Oppermann Rui Vicente
Lutheran University of Brazil, Canoas, Brazil.
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):477-81. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm050. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
The present study evaluated the periodontal conditions in dental students after appliance removal (mean period 7.16 +/- 3.5 years) compared with an untreated control group. Twenty-five subjects in the treated group (16 females and 9 males: 23.0 +/- 2.04 years) and 29 in a control group (15 females and 14 males: 23.99 +/- 2.46 years) underwent a periodontal examination: visible plaque index (VPI), gingival bleeding index (GBI), bleeding on probing (BOP), periodontal probing depth (PPD), and clinical attachment loss (CAL) of canines, premolars, and banded first molars and unbanded second molars. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann-Whitney test, a Student's t-test, and Tukey's analysis of variance. The level of significance was set at 5 per cent. The median percentage of positive sites for the treated and control groups for VPI (1.25 +/- 2.37 and 1.25 +/- 5.45), GBI (0.95 +/- 1.81 and 1.23 +/- 2.14), and BOP (0.83 +/- 6.45 and 0.83 +/- 3.43) did not differ between groups. Mean PPD values were 1.33 +/- 0.19 and 1.34 +/- 0.14 for the treated and 1.40 +/- 0.24 and 1.39 +/- 0.25 for the control group. No intra- or intergroup differences were observed. For the control group, the smallest PPD was at the canines followed by premolars and molars. PPD was less for premolars than molars but similar to the canines in the treated group. No differences in CAL were observed between the examined teeth in the control group. For the treated group, the canines showed lower CAL values than the first molars. The results indicate that the use of orthodontic appliances is not necessarily related to a worsening of periodontal conditions.
本研究评估了与未治疗的对照组相比,牙科学生在矫治器去除后(平均时长7.16±3.5年)的牙周状况。治疗组的25名受试者(16名女性和9名男性,年龄23.0±2.04岁)和对照组的29名受试者(15名女性和14名男性,年龄23.99±2.46岁)接受了牙周检查:可见菌斑指数(VPI)、牙龈出血指数(GBI)、探诊出血(BOP)、牙周探诊深度(PPD),以及犬齿、前磨牙、带环第一磨牙和未带环第二磨牙的临床附着丧失(CAL)。使用曼-惠特尼检验、学生t检验和图基方差分析进行统计分析。显著性水平设定为5%。治疗组和对照组VPI(1.25±2.37和1.25±5.45)、GBI(0.95±1.81和1.23±2.14)和BOP(0.83±6.45和0.83±3.43)阳性部位的中位数百分比在两组之间没有差异。治疗组的平均PPD值分别为1.33±0.19和1.34±0.14,对照组为1.40±0.24和1.39±0.25。未观察到组内或组间差异。对于对照组,最小的PPD出现在犬齿,其次是前磨牙和磨牙。治疗组中前磨牙的PPD小于磨牙,但与犬齿相似。对照组中检查的牙齿之间在CAL方面未观察到差异。对于治疗组,犬齿的CAL值低于第一磨牙。结果表明,正畸矫治器的使用不一定与牙周状况的恶化有关。