Wood Hadley M, Reuther Alwyn M, Gilligan Timothy D, Kupelian Patrick A, Modlin Charles S, Klein Eric A
Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.127. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
We evaluated biochemical relapse-free survival after surgery for localized prostate cancer, comparing rates between black and white men in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras. Our hypothesis was that the gap in biochemical relapse-free survival between these groups would lessen in the later prostate specific antigen era due to catch-up awareness/availability of screening and treatment in the black population.
Data on 2,910 men treated with prostatectomy from 1987 to 2004 were evaluated. The primary end points were 1) rates of organ confined disease and 2) biochemical relapse-free survival after prostatectomy in the early (1987 to 1997) and late (1998 to 2004) prostate specific antigen eras. Rates of organ confined disease were compared using the chi-square test. Biochemical failure was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression.
Median followup for the early and late prostate specific antigen periods was 9.8 (range 1.2 to 18.2) and 3.3 years (range 1.0 to 7.7), respectively. Based on rates of organ confined disease in the early vs late periods black and white men had significant gains in the number presenting with favorable disease at diagnosis in the late prostate specific antigen period (54% vs 76% and 49% vs 71%, respectively, each p <0.01). Despite gains of similar magnitude in favorable features at presentation biochemical relapse-free survival for black men lagged behind white men by 11% at 5 years in the early era and by 12% in the late era. Race was a significant predictor of biochemical relapse-free survival on multivariate analysis in each era.
Despite similar increases in the rate of organ confined disease between black and white men in the late vs early prostate specific antigen eras black men continue to show higher rates of biochemical failure after surgery.
我们评估了局限性前列腺癌手术后无生化复发生存率,比较了早期和晚期前列腺特异性抗原时代黑人和白人男性的这一比率。我们的假设是,由于黑人人群筛查和治疗意识/可及性的提高,这两组之间无生化复发生存的差距在晚期前列腺特异性抗原时代将会缩小。
评估了1987年至2004年接受前列腺切除术的2910名男性的数据。主要终点为:1)器官局限性疾病发生率;2)早期(1987年至1997年)和晚期(1998年至2004年)前列腺特异性抗原时代前列腺切除术后的无生化复发生存率。使用卡方检验比较器官局限性疾病发生率。采用Kaplan-Meier估计法和Cox比例风险回归分析生化失败情况。
早期和晚期前列腺特异性抗原时期的中位随访时间分别为9.8年(范围1.2至18.2年)和3.3年(范围1.0至7.7年)。基于早期与晚期器官局限性疾病发生率,黑人和白人男性在晚期前列腺特异性抗原时期诊断时表现为有利疾病的人数有显著增加(分别为54%对76%和49%对71%,p均<0.01)。尽管在就诊时有利特征方面有相似程度的增加,但在早期,黑人男性的无生化复发生存率在5年时比白人男性落后11%,在晚期落后12%。在每个时代的多变量分析中,种族都是无生化复发生存的显著预测因素。
尽管在晚期与早期前列腺特异性抗原时代,黑人和白人男性器官局限性疾病发生率有相似的增加,但黑人男性术后生化失败率仍然较高。