Suppr超能文献

比尔/贝塔/于克斯屈尔的论文(1899年)以及围绕“生机行为主义”的误解。

The Beer/Bethe/Uexküll paper (1899) and misinterpretations surrounding 'vitalistic behaviorism'.

作者信息

Mildenberger Florian

机构信息

Institute for the History of Medicine, Lessingstrasse 2, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Hist Philos Life Sci. 2006;28(2):175-89.

Abstract

In the history of behaviorism the paper of the three physiologists Theodor Beer, Albrecht Bethe and Jakob von Uexküll from 1899 plays an important role. Many researchers were influenced by this paper and identified it as fundamental for objective psychological research. But during the period of its adoption (1900-1925) psychologists did not notice that Beer, Bethe and Uexküll had distanced themselves from their own paper, because it had been ignored in physiological and biological discussions. Moreover, one of the three (Beer) had to resign from the scientific community because of private scandal and another one (Uexküll) changed all of his views and left the base of objective science for subjective vitalism. However, this did not change his adoption of behaviorism.

摘要

在行为主义的历史中,1899年三位生理学家西奥多·比尔、阿尔布雷希特·贝西和雅各布·冯·于克斯屈尔所撰写的论文发挥了重要作用。许多研究者受到这篇论文的影响,并将其视为客观心理学研究的基础。但在其被采用的时期(1900 - 1925年),心理学家们并未注意到比尔、贝西和于克斯屈尔已经背离了他们自己的论文,因为它在生理学和生物学讨论中被忽视了。此外,三人中的一位(比尔)因私人丑闻不得不退出科学界,另一位(于克斯屈尔)则改变了自己所有的观点,从客观科学的基础转向了主观活力论。然而,这并没有改变他对行为主义的采用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验