Malcolm-Smith Susan, Solms Mark, Turnbull Oliver, Tredoux Colin
ACSENT laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Dec;17(4):1281-91. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Aug 16.
Revonsuo's influential Threat Simulation Theory (TST) predicts that people exposed to survival threats will have more threat dreams, and evince enhanced responses to dream threats, compared to those living in relatively safe conditions. Participants in a high crime area (South Africa: n=208) differed significantly from participants in a low crime area (Wales, UK: n=116) in having greater recent exposure to a life-threatening event (chi([1,N=186])(2)=14.84, p<.00012). Contrary to TST's predictions, the SA participants reported significantly fewer threat dreams (chi([1,N=287])(2)=6.11, p<.0134), and did not differ from the Welsh participants in responses to dream threats (Fisher's Exact test, p=.2478). Overall, the incidence of threat in dreams was extremely low-less than 20% of dreams featured realistic survival threats. Escape from dream threats occurred in less than 2% of dreams. We conclude that this evidence contradicts key aspects of TST.
雷冯佐的有影响力的威胁模拟理论(TST)预测,与生活在相对安全环境中的人相比,面临生存威胁的人会做更多的威胁梦境,并对梦境中的威胁表现出更强的反应。高犯罪率地区(南非:n = 208)的参与者与低犯罪率地区(英国威尔士:n = 116)的参与者相比,近期经历危及生命事件的情况有显著差异(卡方检验,1,N = 186= 14.84,p <.00012)。与TST的预测相反,南非参与者报告的威胁梦境显著更少(卡方检验,1,N = 287= 6.11,p <.0134),并且在对梦境威胁的反应上与威尔士参与者没有差异(费舍尔精确检验,p =.2478)。总体而言,梦境中威胁的发生率极低——不到20%的梦境呈现出现实的生存威胁。不到2%的梦境中有逃离梦境威胁的情节。我们得出结论,这一证据与TST的关键方面相矛盾。