[Higher salary as an incentive for scientific activity?].

BACKGROUND

Few publications are available on how salaries are established for physicians with science as their main occupation. The results of a questionnaire survey to medical doctors are reported.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to members of The Norwegian Medical Association's branch for doctors in academic medicine in spring 2005. Questions concerned how they thought scientific qualifications and production affected their present salary and what they considered to be a reasonable salary for a researcher with their qualifications and production. 304 of 487 (62%) doctors answered.

RESULTS

The study included 128 full-time professors, 101 associate professors or post-doctoral scientists with a PhD, 44 scientists without a PhD and 31 PhD-students. The average age was 52 years, and 28% were women. 71% had a university as their main employer. The median number of peer-reviewed scientific publications was 19 per physician-scientist for the last 5 years. The average annual salary was 498,000 NOK, and the average increase in salary considered to be reasonable was 279,000 NOK. A reasonable salary for evaluating a PhD-thesis was considered to be 18,700 NOK and that for giving a 45-minute lecture was 3,200 NOK. In a multiple linear regression analysis on actual salary, the significant predictors were employer, scientific qualifications, age, and sex. Predictors for the difference between reasonable and actual salary was scientific production and employer. Age, employer or scientific qualifications could not predict who considered a doubling of the present salary (for a 45-minute lecture and evaluating a PhD) to be appropriate.

INTERPRETATION

Universities should be aware of the large gap between salaries to physician-scientists employed by universities and to those employed by other institutions. Scientific production should be more emphasized in future negotiations on salaries.