Suppr超能文献

无创正压通气在心脏手术后呼吸困难护理中的疗效与安全性

[Efficacy and safety of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the care of dyspnea after cardiac surgery].

作者信息

Chen Xiao-Feng, Ye Ji-Lu

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Taizhou People's Hospital, Medical College, Yangzhou University, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2007 Sep;19(9):542-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy and safety of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the care of dyspnea after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Among patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from December 2004 to December 2006,58 patients developed dyspnea (respiratory rate>25 breaths per minute with "three depressions" sign) and acute respiratory failure after extubation. Among them 30 patients underwent NPPV and 28 patients were treated with face mask oxygen therapy. Intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation were begun when the treatment failed or still hypoxemic [partial pressure of oxygen in artery (PaO(2))<60 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)], ventricle arrhythmia, or other indications for endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between two groups in age,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score,duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp, and New York Heart Association class (all P>0.05). Compared with face mask oxygen therapy group, NPPV was associated with a lower incidence of arrhythmia (P<0.05) at 120 minutes after treatment, a lesser necessity for reintubation (P<0.01), a shorter length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) (P<0.01), a lower mortality (P<0.05). Arterial pH and arterial CO(2) partial pressure (PaCO(2)) of two groups began to rise significant at 480 minutes (P<0.05 or P<0.01), PaCO(2) began to rise at 120 minutes (P<0.05). At 30 minutes, significant differences in PaO(2), HCO(-)(3), respiratory rate, heart rate and arterial systolic blood pressure in NPPV group began to appear (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The time of significant differences in PaO(2), HCO(-)(3), respiratory rate, heart rate and arterial systolic blood pressure in face mask oxygen therapy group were respectively 120, 60, 120, 480 and 480 minutes (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Lactate concentration showed a significant drop at 60 minutes in NPPV (P<0.05), but at 480 minutes in face mask oxygen therapy group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that NPPV is an effective and safe means for improving dyspnea and tissue perfusion, decreasing arrhythmia and necessity for reintubation, shortening the length of stay in ICU and decreasing mortality in dyspneic patients after cardiac surgery.

摘要

目的

研究无创正压通气(NPPV)在心脏手术后呼吸困难护理中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在2004年12月至2006年12月接受体外循环心脏手术的患者中,58例患者在拔管后出现呼吸困难(呼吸频率>25次/分钟伴“三凹征”)及急性呼吸衰竭。其中30例患者接受NPPV治疗,28例患者接受面罩吸氧治疗。当治疗失败或仍存在低氧血症[动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)<60 mmHg(1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa)]、室性心律失常或其他气管插管指征时,开始进行气管插管和有创机械通气。

结果

两组在年龄、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、体外循环时间和主动脉阻断时间以及纽约心脏协会心功能分级方面均无显著差异(均P>0.05)。与面罩吸氧治疗组相比,NPPV治疗后120分钟时心律失常发生率较低(P<0.05),再次插管的必要性较小(P<0.01),重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间较短(P<0.01),死亡率较低(P<0.05)。两组动脉血pH值和动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)在480分钟时开始显著升高(P<0.05或P<0.01),PaCO₂在120分钟时开始升高(P<0.05)。30分钟时,NPPV组在PaO₂、碳酸氢根(HCO₃⁻)、呼吸频率、心率和动脉收缩压方面开始出现显著差异(P<0.05或P<0.01)。面罩吸氧治疗组在PaO₂、HCO₃⁻、呼吸频率、心率和动脉收缩压方面出现显著差异的时间分别为120、60、120、480和480分钟(P<0.05或P<0.01)。NPPV组乳酸浓度在60分钟时显著下降(P<0.05),而面罩吸氧治疗组在480分钟时显著下降(P<0.05)。

结论

这些结果表明,NPPV是改善心脏手术后呼吸困难患者的呼吸困难和组织灌注、降低心律失常发生率和再次插管必要性、缩短ICU住院时间及降低死亡率的一种有效且安全的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验