Pusic Andrea L, Chen Constance M, Cano Stefan, Klassen Anne, McCarthy Colleen, Collins E Dale, Cordeiro Peter G
New York, N.Y.; London, United Kingdom; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and Lebanon, N.H. From the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, University College London, University of British Columbia, and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Sep 15;120(4):823-837. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000278162.82906.81.
Patient-reported outcomes in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery are increasingly important for clinical research endeavors. Traditional surgical outcomes, centered on morbidity and mortality, remain important but are no longer sufficient on their own. Quality of life has become a crucial research topic augmenting traditional concerns focused on complications and survival. Given this, reliable and valid patient questionnaires are essential for aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgeons.
The authors performed a systematic literature review to identify patient-reported outcome measures developed and validated for use in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery patients. Qualifying instruments were assessed for adherence to international guidelines for health outcomes instrument development and validation.
The authors identified 227 health outcomes questionnaires used in breast surgery studies. After 135 generic instruments, 65 ad hoc instruments, seven oncologic instruments, 11 education questionnaires, and two non-English-language questionnaires were excluded, seven measures remained. Detailed analysis revealed that six of the seven measures had undergone limited development and validation. Only one measure, the Breast-Related Symptoms Questionnaire, demonstrated adequate development and validation in its target population. It had, nevertheless, significant content limitations.
Valid, reliable, and responsive instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery are lacking. To demonstrate the benefits of aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery, future research to rigorously develop and validate new cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery-specific instruments is needed.
在美容和重建乳房手术中,患者报告的结果对于临床研究工作越来越重要。以发病率和死亡率为中心的传统手术结果仍然很重要,但仅凭这些已不再足够。生活质量已成为一个关键的研究课题,它补充了传统上对并发症和生存率的关注。鉴于此,可靠且有效的患者问卷对于美容和重建乳房外科医生来说至关重要。
作者进行了一项系统的文献综述,以确定已开发并验证可用于美容和重建乳房手术患者的患者报告结局测量方法。对符合条件的工具进行评估,看其是否符合健康结局工具开发和验证的国际准则。
作者在乳房手术研究中识别出227份健康结局问卷。在排除135份通用工具、65份特设工具、7份肿瘤学工具、11份教育问卷和2份非英语问卷后,还剩下7份测量方法。详细分析显示,这7份测量方法中的6份仅经过了有限的开发和验证。只有一项测量方法,即乳房相关症状问卷,在其目标人群中显示出充分的开发和验证。然而,它在内容上仍有显著局限性。
缺乏有效、可靠且灵敏的工具来测量美容和重建乳房手术中患者报告的结果。为了证明美容和重建乳房手术的益处,未来需要进行严格开发和验证新的美容和重建乳房手术专用工具的研究。