Cranney Ann, Jamal Sophie A, Tsang James F, Josse Robert G, Leslie William D
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.
CMAJ. 2007 Sep 11;177(6):575-80. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070234.
The study objectives were to determine fracture rates in relation to bone mineral density at various central skeletal sites, using the World Health Organization definition for osteoporosis (T-score -2.5 or less), and to contrast fracture patterns among women 50 to 64 years of age with those among women 65 years of age and older.
Historical cohort study with a mean observation period of 3.2 (standard deviation [SD] 1.5) years. The study group (16,505 women 50 years of age or older) was drawn from the Manitoba Bone Density Program database, which includes all bone mineral density results for Manitoba. Baseline density measurements for the lumbar spine and hip were performed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Outcomes included the percentage of osteoporotic fractures and the rates of fracture and excess fracture (per 1000 person-years) among postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis relative to those with normal bone mineral density (according to the classification of the World Health Organization).
The mean age was 65 (SD 9) years, and the mean T-scores for all sites fell within the osteopenic category. There were 765 incident fractures (fracture rate 14.5 [95% confidence interval, CI, 13.5-15.6 [per 1000 person-years). Fracture rates were significantly higher among women 65 years of age or older than among women 50-64 years of age (21.6 [95% CI 19.7-23.4] v. 8.6 [95% CI 7.5-9.7] per 1000 person-years, p < 0.001). Although fracture rates were significantly higher among women with osteoporotic T-scores, most fractures occurred in women with nonosteoporotic values (min-max: 59.7%-67.8%).
In this study, most of the postmenopausal women with osteoporotic fractures had nonosteoporotic bone mineral density values. This finding highlights the importance of considering key clinical risk factors that operate independently of bone mineral density (such as age) when assessing fracture risk.
本研究的目的是使用世界卫生组织对骨质疏松症的定义(T值≤-2.5)来确定不同中轴骨骼部位的骨折率与骨密度的关系,并对比50至64岁女性与65岁及以上女性的骨折模式。
进行历史队列研究,平均观察期为3.2(标准差[SD]1.5)年。研究组(16505名50岁及以上女性)来自曼尼托巴骨密度项目数据库,该数据库包含曼尼托巴省所有的骨密度检测结果。采用双能X线吸收法对腰椎和髋部进行基线密度测量。结局指标包括骨质疏松性骨折的百分比以及绝经后骨质减少和骨质疏松女性相对于骨密度正常女性(根据世界卫生组织的分类)的骨折率和额外骨折率(每1000人年)。
平均年龄为65(SD 9)岁,所有部位的平均T值均处于骨质减少类别。共有765例新发骨折(骨折率为14.5[95%置信区间,CI,13.5 - 15.6][每1000人年])。65岁及以上女性的骨折率显著高于50 - 64岁女性(每1000人年分别为21.6[95%CI 19.7 - 23.4]和8.6[95%CI 7.5 - 9.7],p < 0.001)。尽管T值为骨质疏松的女性骨折率显著更高,但大多数骨折发生在T值非骨质疏松的女性中(最小值 - 最大值:59.7% - 67.8%)。
在本研究中,大多数发生骨质疏松性骨折的绝经后女性骨密度值并非骨质疏松。这一发现凸显了在评估骨折风险时考虑独立于骨密度的关键临床风险因素(如年龄)的重要性。