Suppr超能文献

手机及其他电器的电流与磁通密度测量所得的频谱。

Frequency spectra from current vs. magnetic flux density measurements for mobile phones and other electrical appliances.

作者信息

Straume Aksel, Johnsson Anders, Oftedal Gunnhild, Wilén Jonna

机构信息

Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Health Phys. 2007 Oct;93(4):279-87. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000266739.54093.9f.

Abstract

The frequency spectra of electromagnetic fields have to be determined to evaluate human exposure in accordance to ICNIRP guidelines. In the literature, comparisons with magnetic field guidelines have been performed by using the frequency distribution of the current drawn from the battery. In the present study we compared the frequency spectrum in the range 217 Hz to 2.4 kHz of the magnetic flux density measured near the surface of a mobile phone with the frequency spectrum of the supply current. By using the multiple frequency rule, recommended in the ICNIRP guidelines, we estimated the magnetic field exposure in the two cases. Similar measurements and estimations were done for an electric drill, a hair dryer, and a fluorescent desk lamp. All the devices have a basic frequency of 50 Hz, and the frequency spectra were evaluated up to 550 Hz. We also mapped the magnetic field in 3D around three mobile phones. The frequency distributions obtained from the two measurement methods are not equal. The frequency content of the current leads to an overestimation of the magnetic field exposure by a factor up to 2.2 for the mobile phone. For the drill, the hair dryer, and the fluorescent lamp, the supply current signal underestimated the exposure by a factor up to 2.3. In conclusion, an accurate exposure evaluation requires the magnetic flux density spectrum of the device to be measured directly. There was no indication that the devices studied would exceed the reference levels at the working distances normally used.

摘要

必须确定电磁场的频谱,以便根据国际非电离辐射防护委员会(ICNIRP)的指导方针评估人体暴露情况。在文献中,通过使用从电池汲取的电流的频率分布,与磁场指导方针进行了比较。在本研究中,我们将手机表面附近测得的磁通密度在217Hz至2.4kHz范围内的频谱与电源电流的频谱进行了比较。通过使用ICNIRP指导方针中推荐的多频率规则,我们估计了这两种情况下的磁场暴露。对电钻、吹风机和荧光台灯进行了类似的测量和估计。所有设备的基本频率均为50Hz,并且对高达550Hz的频谱进行了评估。我们还绘制了三部手机周围的三维磁场图。从两种测量方法获得的频率分布不相等。对于手机,电流的频率成分导致磁场暴露的高估,高估因子高达2.2。对于电钻、吹风机和荧光灯,电源电流信号将暴露低估了高达2.3倍。总之,准确的暴露评估需要直接测量设备的磁通密度频谱。没有迹象表明所研究的设备在正常使用的工作距离下会超过参考水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验