Spijkerman D C, Snijders C J, Stijnen T, Lankhorst G J
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23(4):203-6.
The aim of our study was to test grip strength and assess the effects of various degrees of standardization on repeatability and level of peak force. Sixteen healthy persons and eight subjects with an impaired hand function have been tested using a strain-gauge dynamometer. We compared four measurement protocols: (A) the subject is free to assume a comfortable arm position; (B) the subject is also free to assume a comfortable arm position but in addition a challenging stimulus to exceed a previous maximal effort, is given; (C) the arm was held in a predescribed and partly fixated position, as recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists; (D) the position of the dynamometer is standardized using two reference points both on the hand and on the dynamometer. We found high test-retest reliabilities for each measurement protocol without any significant difference. There were, however, significant differences in strength level. With measurements according to protocol B the highest peak values were noted. Since the measurement protocol B combined good reliability with realistic peak forces, this procedure seems most suitable for grip strength measurements.
我们研究的目的是测试握力,并评估不同程度的标准化对重复性和峰值力水平的影响。使用应变式测力计对16名健康人和8名手部功能受损的受试者进行了测试。我们比较了四种测量方案:(A)受试者可自由采取舒适的手臂姿势;(B)受试者同样可自由采取舒适的手臂姿势,但另外给予一个挑战性刺激以超过先前的最大努力;(C)按照美国手部治疗师协会的建议,将手臂保持在预先规定的部分固定位置;(D)使用手部和测力计上的两个参考点对测力计的位置进行标准化。我们发现每个测量方案的重测信度都很高,且无显著差异。然而,在力量水平上存在显著差异。按照方案B进行测量时,记录到的峰值最高。由于测量方案B将良好的信度与实际的峰值力相结合,因此该程序似乎最适合用于握力测量。