The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Augment Altern Commun. 2007;23(4):288-99. doi: 10.1080/07434610601152140.
People who use augmentative or alternative communication (AAC) need access to a relevant, socially valid vocabulary if they are to communicate successfully in a variety of contexts. Many people with complex communication needs who utilize some form of high technology or low technology AAC rely on others to predict and select vocabulary for them. In this study the ability of one speech pathologist, nine leisure support workers, and six people with cerebral palsy to accurately predict context-specific vocabulary was explored. Participants predicted vocabulary for two leisure activities - sailing session and Internet café - using the blank page method of vocabulary selection to identify the vocabulary items they considered important for each activity. This predicted vocabulary was then compared with the actual vocabulary used in each of the activities. A total of 187 (68%) of the words predicted for the sailing session were used during recorded conversations, with 88 words (32%) not appearing in the recorded samples. During the visit to the Internet café only 104 (47%) of the words predicted occurred in the recorded samples, with 117 words (53%) not occurring at all. These results support the need to socially validate any vocabulary in order to ensure that it is relevant and useful for the person using the AAC system.
如果人们想要在各种情境中成功地进行交流,他们需要使用相关的、具有社会有效性的词汇。许多患有复杂沟通需求的人,他们使用某种形式的高科技或低科技的辅助沟通设备,依赖于其他人来为他们预测和选择词汇。在这项研究中,探索了一名言语治疗师、九名休闲支持工作者和六名脑瘫患者准确预测特定语境词汇的能力。参与者使用词汇选择的空白页方法,预测了两个休闲活动——帆船课程和网吧——的词汇,以确定他们认为每个活动重要的词汇项目。然后将预测的词汇与每个活动中实际使用的词汇进行比较。在记录的对话中,帆船课程预测的 187 个词汇中有 136 个(68%)被使用,而 88 个词汇(32%)没有出现在记录样本中。在网吧的访问中,仅记录了预测词汇的 104 个(47%),而 117 个词汇(53%)根本没有出现。这些结果支持了需要对任何词汇进行社会验证,以确保其对使用辅助沟通系统的人是相关和有用的。