Kacar Sabite, Uysal Selma, Kuran Sedef, Dagli Ulku, Ozin Yasemin, Karabulut Erdem, Sasmaz Nurgul
Gastroenterology Department, Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Hospital, Dikmen Cad 220/A, No 17 Dikmen, Ankara, Turkey.
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct 21;13(39):5245-52. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i39.5245.
To determine the gastroesophageal refluxate in the cervical esophagus (CE) and measure transcutaneous cervical esophageal ultrasound (TCEUS) findings [anterior wall thickness (WT) of CE, esophageal luminal diameter (ELD), esophageal diameter (ED)]; to compare TCEUS findings in the patient subgroups divided according to 24-h esophageal pH monitoring and manometry; and to investigate possible cut-off values according to the TCEUS findings as a predictor of gastroesophageal reflux (GER).
In 45/500 patients, refluxate was visualized in TCEUS. 38/45 patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), 24-h pH monitoring and manometry.
The 38 patients were grouped according to 24-h pH monitoring as follows: Group A: GER-positive (n = 20) [Includes Group B: isolated proximal reflux (PR) (n = 6), Group C: isolated distal reflux (DR) (n = 6), and Group D: both PR/DR (n = 8)]; Group E: no reflux (n = 13); and Group F: hypersensitive esophagus (HSE) (n = 5). Groups B + D indicated total PR patients (n = 14), Groups E + F reflux-negatives with HSE (n = 18), and Groups A + F reflux-positives with HSE (n = 25). When the 38 patients were grouped according to manometry findings, 24 had normal esophageal manometry; 7 had hypotensive and 2 had hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES); and 5 had ineffective esophageal motility disorder (IEM). The ELD measurement was greater in group A + F than group E (P = 0.023, 5.0 +/- 1.3 vs 3.9 +/- 1.4 mm). In 27/38 patients, there was at least one pathologic acid reflux and/or pathologic manometry finding. The cut-off value for ELD of 4.83 mm had 79% sensitivity and 61% specificity in predicting the PR between Groups B + D and E (AUC = 0.775, P = 0.015).
Visualizing refluxate in TCEUS was useful as a pre-diagnostic tool for estimating GER or manometric pathology in 71.1% of adults in our study, but it was not diagnostic for CE WT.
确定颈段食管(CE)中的胃食管反流物,并测量经皮颈段食管超声(TCEUS)的结果[CE前壁厚度(WT)、食管腔内径(ELD)、食管直径(ED)];比较根据24小时食管pH监测和测压划分的患者亚组中的TCEUS结果;并根据TCEUS结果研究可能的截断值,作为胃食管反流(GER)的预测指标。
在500例患者中的45例中,TCEUS显示出反流物。45例患者中的38例接受了食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)、24小时pH监测和测压。
38例患者根据24小时pH监测分组如下:A组:GER阳性(n = 20)[包括B组:孤立性近端反流(PR)(n = 6)、C组:孤立性远端反流(DR)(n = 6)和D组:PR/DR均有(n = 8)];E组:无反流(n = 13);F组:高敏食管(HSE)(n = 5)。B组+D组表示PR患者总数(n = 14),E组+F组为无反流合并HSE(n = 18),A组+F组为有反流合并HSE(n = 25)。当根据测压结果对38例患者进行分组时,24例食管测压正常;7例食管下括约肌(LES)压力降低,2例LES压力升高;5例有无效食管动力障碍(IEM)。A组+F组的ELD测量值大于E组(P = 0.023,5.0±1.3 vs 3.9±1.4 mm)。38例患者中有27例至少有一项病理性酸反流和/或病理性测压结果。ELD的截断值为4.83 mm,在预测B组+D组和E组之间的PR时,敏感性为79%,特异性为61%(AUC = 0.775,P = 0.015)。
在我们的研究中,TCEUS显示反流物作为一种预诊断工具,对估计71.1%的成年人的GER或测压病理情况有用,但对CE的WT无诊断价值。