Moodley Keymanthri
Bioethics Unit - Tygerberg Division, Faculty of Health Sciences and Centre for Applied Ethics, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Sep 19;8:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-10.
HIV prevention research has been fraught with ethical concerns since its inception. These concerns were highlighted during HIV vaccine research and have been elaborated in microbicide research. A host of unique ethical concerns pervade the microbicide research process from trial design to post-trial microbicide availability. Given the urgency of research and development in the face of the devastating HIV pandemic, these ethical concerns represent an enormous challenge for investigators, sponsors and Research Ethics Committees (RECs) both locally and internationally.
Ethical concerns relating to safety in microbicide research are a major international concern. However, in the urgency to develop a medically efficacious microbicide, some of these concerns may not have been anticipated. In the risk-benefit assessment of research protocols, both medical and psycho-social risk must be considered. In this paper four main areas that have a potential for medical and/or psycho-social harm are examined. Male partner involvement is controversial in the setting of covert use of microbicides. However, given the long-term exposure of men to experimental products, this may be methodologically, ethically and legally important. Covert use of microbicides may impact negatively on relationship dynamics leading to psychosocial harm to varying extents. The unexpectedly high rates of pregnancy during clinical trials raise important methodological and ethical concerns. Enrollment of adolescents without parental consent generates ethical and legal concerns that must be carefully considered by RECs and trial sites. Finally, paradoxical outcomes in recent trials internationally have advanced the debate on the nature of informed consent and responsibility of researchers to participants who become HIV positive during or after trials.
Phase 3 microbicide trials are an undisputed research and ethical priority in developing countries. However, such trials must be conducted with attention to both methodological and ethical detail. It is imperative that guidelines are formulated to ensure that high ethical standards are maintained despite the scientific urgency of microbicide development. Given the controversy raised by emergent ethical issues during the course of microbicide development, it is important that international consensus is reached amongst the various ethics and regulatory agencies in developing and developed countries alike.
自艾滋病病毒(HIV)预防研究开展以来,一直充满伦理问题。这些问题在HIV疫苗研究期间得到凸显,并在杀微生物剂研究中得到详尽阐述。从试验设计到试验后杀微生物剂的可用性,一系列独特的伦理问题贯穿于杀微生物剂研究过程。鉴于面对毁灭性的HIV大流行时研发工作的紧迫性,这些伦理问题对国内外的研究者、资助者和研究伦理委员会(RECs)而言都是巨大挑战。
与杀微生物剂研究安全性相关的伦理问题是一项重大国际关切。然而,在急于研发出具有医学疗效的杀微生物剂的过程中,其中一些问题可能未被预料到。在研究方案的风险效益评估中,必须同时考虑医学风险和心理社会风险。本文探讨了四个可能造成医学和/或心理社会伤害的主要领域。在秘密使用杀微生物剂的情况下,男性伴侣的参与存在争议。然而,鉴于男性长期接触实验产品,这在方法学、伦理和法律方面可能都很重要。秘密使用杀微生物剂可能对关系动态产生负面影响,在不同程度上导致心理社会伤害。临床试验期间意外高的怀孕率引发了重要的方法学和伦理问题。未经父母同意招募青少年引发了伦理和法律问题,研究伦理委员会和试验场所必须仔细考虑。最后,近期国际上试验中的矛盾结果推动了关于知情同意的性质以及研究者对在试验期间或试验后感染HIV的参与者的责任的辩论。
在发展中国家,3期杀微生物剂试验是无可争议的研究和伦理重点。然而,此类试验必须在关注方法学细节和伦理细节的情况下进行。尽管杀微生物剂研发具有科学紧迫性,但制定指导方针以确保维持高伦理标准势在必行。鉴于杀微生物剂研发过程中出现的伦理问题引发了争议,发展中国家和发达国家的各种伦理和监管机构达成国际共识非常重要。