Bock H Andreas, Hirt-Minkowski Patricia, Brünisholz Michel, Keusch Gerald, Rey Simone, von Albertini Beat
Division of Nephrology, Kantonsspital, Aarau, Switzerland.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Jan;23(1):301-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm579. Epub 2007 Sep 22.
The conversion of patients on stable epoetin therapy to darbepoetin alpha is usually carried out according to the '1 microg darbepoetin =200 U epoetin' rule, which is based on the protein content of the two compounds. Since several observations have suggested that this conversion factor leads to an overestimate of the required darbepoetin dose, the present multicentre study was designed to assess the true conversion ratio by prospectively evaluating the change in darbepoetin alpha dose after conversion from epoetin, which was required to keep haemoglobin (Hb) stable.
Haemodialysis patients with stable Hb and maintained on either s.c. or i.v. epoetin (alpha or beta) were switched to intravenously administered darbepoetin alpha according to the 1:200 rule. Subjects treated with epoetin two or three times per week received one weekly dose of darbepoetin alpha, subjects on weekly epoetin received darbepoetin alpha every 2 weeks. For 20 weeks, darbepoetin alpha was changed every 2 weeks according to a pre-specified algorithm, if this was needed to keep Hb within +/-1.0 g/dl of each subject's individual baseline. Thereafter, patients entered a 4-week evaluation period.
One hundred ad thirty-two patients in 17 Swiss centres were enrolled and 100 completed the study throughout the evaluation period. While mean Hb was maintained stable between baseline and evaluation period (11.8+/-0.6 g/dl in both), the mean required darbepoetin alpha dose decreased from 34.7+/-2.1 to 26.0+/-1.8 microg (-25%, P<0.0001), yielding a mean final conversion ratio of 1:336. A dose decrease was observed in 56 patients, no dose change in 28 and an increase in 16 patients. Dose reduction strongly depended on baseline epoetin dose: no dose reduction was required for baseline epoetin doses <5000 U/week, whereas a 37% lower mean dose was necessary for baseline doses of 7000-10 000 U/week. The darbepoetin alpha dose reduction did not depend on the previous epoetin type (alpha or beta) or the previous epoetin administration route (i.v. vs s.c.).
The mean darbepoetin alpha dose needed to keep Hb stable in patients previously treated with epoetin is significantly lower than the equimolar dose. Although the equimolar 1:200 conversion ratio is appropriate for lower epoetin doses (<5000 IU/week), the darbepoetin dose for patients converting from >or=5000 IU of epoetin per week is more likely to follow a 1:250 to 1:350 conversion rule. If pricing is based on the 1:200 rule such as in Switzerland, this may translate into cost savings.
通常依据“1微克α - 达比波汀 = 200单位促红细胞生成素”的规则,将接受稳定促红细胞生成素治疗的患者转换为使用α - 达比波汀,该规则基于两种化合物的蛋白质含量。由于多项观察结果表明,此转换因子会导致对所需α - 达比波汀剂量的高估,因此开展了本多中心研究,旨在通过前瞻性评估从促红细胞生成素转换后为维持血红蛋白(Hb)稳定所需的α - 达比波汀剂量变化,来评估真实的转换率。
血红蛋白稳定且接受皮下或静脉注射促红细胞生成素(α或β)治疗的血液透析患者,按照1:200的规则转换为静脉注射α - 达比波汀。每周接受两次或三次促红细胞生成素治疗的受试者,每周接受一次α - 达比波汀治疗;每周接受一次促红细胞生成素治疗的受试者,每2周接受一次α - 达比波汀治疗。在20周内,根据预先设定的算法,每2周调整一次α - 达比波汀剂量,前提是需要将每位受试者的血红蛋白维持在其个体基线水平的±1.0 g/dl范围内。此后,患者进入为期4周的评估期。
17个瑞士中心的132名患者入组,100名患者在整个评估期内完成了研究。虽然平均血红蛋白在基线期和评估期之间保持稳定(两者均为11.8±0.6 g/dl),但所需α - 达比波汀的平均剂量从34.7±2.1微克降至26.0±1.8微克(-25%,P<0.0001),最终平均转换率为1:336。56名患者出现剂量降低,28名患者剂量无变化,16名患者剂量增加。剂量降低强烈依赖于基线促红细胞生成素剂量:基线促红细胞生成素剂量<5000单位/周时无需降低剂量,而基线剂量为7000 - 10000单位/周时,平均剂量需要降低37%。α - 达比波汀剂量降低并不取决于先前使用的促红细胞生成素类型(α或β)或先前的促红细胞生成素给药途径(静脉注射与皮下注射)。
对于先前接受促红细胞生成素治疗的患者,维持血红蛋白稳定所需的α - 达比波汀平均剂量显著低于等摩尔剂量。虽然等摩尔的1:200转换率适用于较低的促红细胞生成素剂量(<5000国际单位/周),但对于每周从≥5000国际单位促红细胞生成素转换而来的患者,α - 达比波汀剂量更可能遵循1:250至1:350的转换规则。如果定价基于1:200的规则,如在瑞士,这可能会节省成本。