Suppr超能文献

肠内镇静个体化给药的安全性证据。

Evidence of safety for individualized dosing of enteral sedation.

作者信息

Gordon Sharon M, Shimizu N, Shlash D, Dionne R A

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore College of Dental Surgery, USA.

出版信息

Gen Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;55(5):410-5.

Abstract

Fear of dentistry is a pervasive and persistent phenomenon that contributes to avoidance of dental care and results in a substantial public health problem. While the use of incremental enteral sedation has increased, there is a paucity of published evidence to evaluate its safety. This study sought to assess the safety of individualized dosing of enteral sedation for adults in the dental outpatient setting. The authors sent a mail survey to members of the Dental Organization for Conscious Sedation (DOCS) concerning their practice and practitioner characteristics. Anonymous treatment forms with monitoring records were collected from respondents and analyzed for pre-specified adverse event criteria. The majority of respondents reported practicing incremental enteral sedation for two to five years, accounting for less than 10% of their practice. Incremental enteral sedation, either alone or in combination with nitrous oxide and oxygen, was used most frequently. Monitoring with both pulse oximetry and automated blood pressure (BP) were prevalent. Triazolam was the drug used most commonly for enteral sedation. Of the 7740 cases submitted, 1686 (21.8%) met event criteria; the most frequent event was a decrease of more than 25% in diastolic BP from pre-drug baseline. Neither provider training nor the percentage of practices engaged in incremental enteral sedation were associated with any event; however, practicing incremental enteral sedation for less than 12 months was a significant predictor of any event (p = 0.001). Risk of having an event was not related to practice factors (that is, the time spent practicing incremental enteral sedation, the percentage of the practice devoted to practicing incremental enteral sedation, the number of cases performed, or the type of monitoring) or training factors. This survey represents the largest number of subjects reported in the literature concerning enteral sedation. These observations provide evidence for the safety of enteral sedation when these drugs and combinations are administered by properly-trained dentists who monitor patients with pulse oximetry, BP measurement, and direct observation.

摘要

对牙科治疗的恐惧是一种普遍且持续存在的现象,它导致人们回避牙科护理,进而引发了一个严重的公共卫生问题。尽管逐步肠内镇静的使用有所增加,但关于其安全性的已发表证据却很少。本研究旨在评估牙科门诊环境中成人肠内镇静个体化给药的安全性。作者向清醒镇静牙科组织(DOCS)的成员发送了一份邮件调查问卷,询问他们的执业情况和从业者特征。从受访者那里收集了带有监测记录的匿名治疗表格,并针对预先设定的不良事件标准进行分析。大多数受访者报告称进行逐步肠内镇静已有两到五年,这占他们执业量的不到10%。单独使用逐步肠内镇静或与一氧化二氮和氧气联合使用最为频繁。同时使用脉搏血氧饱和度仪和自动血压监测很普遍。三唑仑是肠内镇静最常用的药物。在提交的7740例病例中,1686例(21.8%)符合事件标准;最常见的事件是舒张压较用药前基线下降超过25%。提供者培训和进行逐步肠内镇静的执业比例均与任何事件无关;然而,进行逐步肠内镇静少于12个月是任何事件的一个显著预测因素(p = 0.001)。发生事件的风险与执业因素(即进行逐步肠内镇静的时间、用于逐步肠内镇静的执业比例、实施的病例数或监测类型)或培训因素无关。这项调查是文献中报道的关于肠内镇静的受试者数量最多的。这些观察结果为经过适当培训、使用脉搏血氧饱和度仪监测患者、测量血压并进行直接观察的牙医给予这些药物及联合用药时肠内镇静的安全性提供了证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验