Suppr超能文献

用光学聚集法比较没食子酸丙酯阳离子与二磷酸腺苷用于测量阿司匹林有效性的研究

Comparison of cationic propyl gallate and adenosine diphosphate for the measurement of aspirin effectivity with optical aggregometry.

作者信息

Motovska Zuzana, Sujanova Zdenka, Wimmerova Sona, Ardo Jan, Skrakova Marcela, Widimsky Petr

机构信息

Cardiocentre, Third Medical School Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, and the Clinic of Haematologie, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.

出版信息

Transl Res. 2007 Oct;150(4):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 May 25.

Abstract

To compare the newer inductor of platelet aggregation cationic propyl gallate (CPG) with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) for the examination of aspirin (ASA) effectivity with optical aggregometry. In total,116 patients were prospectively enrolled with a stable cardiovascular disease, taking ASA 100 mg/day for >or=1 month. The control group consisted of 62 healthy volunteers. A platelet aggregation was investigated by optical aggregometry (aggregometer LASER 4x; BIO ART, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium). CPG and ADP were added as aggregating agents. The measured parameters were CPG-slope (%/min) and ADP max (%). Using the CPG-slope values from the control group, the CPG-slope cut-off value was determined to define a laboratory ASA-noneffectively treated patient. The values from control group followed a normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test). We calculated the cut-off value using the 1-tailed 95% confidence interval. The CPG-slope cut-off value was 79 %/min for an ASA-effectively treated patient. We marked the patients as laboratory ASA-noneffective treated when the CPG-slope was >79%/min. In the same way we defined the cut-off value for ADP-max. We identified the aspirin treatment as ineffective when the value of ADP-max was >62%. The values of CPG-slope and ADP-max were in close correlation in the group of patients treated with aspirin with a highly significant correlation index (r=0.671, P<0.001). By CPG-induced optical aggregation, 33,6% were ASA-noneffectively treated patients. When using both inductors, the proportion of ASA-noneffectively treated patients was 25%. Using both tests, 72.4% of patients were equally divided. ASA-noneffectively treated patients were commonly more obese (46.2%), had hypertension (94.9%) and hypercholesterolemia (73.7%), and were less commonly treated with statins (30.8%) than the aspirin effectively treated patients (42%, 88.2%, 59.2%, and 42.1%, respectively). The detected differences were not statistically significant. Cationic propyl gallate is an optimal inductor for optical aggregometry to monitor laboratory effectiveness of aspirin therapy in routine clinical pratice. The determined high prevalence of laboratory aspirin ineffectiveness highlights the clinical importance of the problem. This study brings attention to the importance of controlling cardiovascular risk factors.

摘要

采用光学聚集测定法,比较新型血小板聚集诱导剂阳离子没食子酸丙酯(CPG)与二磷酸腺苷(ADP)用于检测阿司匹林(ASA)疗效的情况。总共前瞻性纳入了116例患有稳定心血管疾病且服用ASA 100mg/天≥1个月的患者。对照组由62名健康志愿者组成。通过光学聚集测定法(聚集测定仪LASER 4x;比利时圣卡特琳-韦弗市的BIO ART公司)检测血小板聚集情况。添加CPG和ADP作为聚集剂。测量参数为CPG斜率(%/分钟)和ADP最大值(%)。利用对照组的CPG斜率值确定CPG斜率临界值,以界定实验室中ASA治疗无效的患者。对照组的值呈正态分布(Shapiro-Wilk检验)。我们使用单尾95%置信区间计算临界值。对于ASA治疗有效的患者,CPG斜率临界值为79%/分钟。当CPG斜率>79%/分钟时,我们将患者标记为实验室ASA治疗无效。同样地,我们定义了ADP最大值的临界值。当ADP最大值>62%时,我们将阿司匹林治疗判定为无效。在接受阿司匹林治疗的患者组中,CPG斜率值和ADP最大值密切相关,相关指数高度显著(r = 0.671,P<0.001)。通过CPG诱导的光学聚集,33.6%为ASA治疗无效的患者。同时使用两种诱导剂时,ASA治疗无效患者的比例为25%。两种检测方法均显示,72.4%的患者被同等划分。与ASA治疗有效的患者相比(分别为42%、88.2%、59.2%和42.1%),ASA治疗无效的患者通常更肥胖(4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验