Yusup Anwar, Akino Hironobu, Miwa Yoshiji, Oyama Nobuyuki, Aoki Yoshitaka, Ito Hideaki, Tanase Kazuya, Matsuta Yosuke, Nakai Masaharu, Yokoyama Osamu
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Fukui, 23-3 Shimoaizuki, Matsuoka, Fukui 910-1193, Japan.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2007 Dec 22;577(1-3):143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.08.032. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
Muscarinic receptor antagonists are used clinically for their therapeutic peripheral effects on bladder function. However, these agents may also act on central muscarinic receptors, especially in individuals with compromised blood-brain barrier function. We compared the effects of atropine and tolterodine, agents that do and do not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, respectively, administered peripherally (intravenous [i.v.]) and centrally (intracerebroventricular [i.c.v.]) on cystometrography in conscious rats after cerebral infarction induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion or sham surgery. We hypothesized that tolterodine would produce greater improvement in bladder capacity and less impairment in bladder contractility and that the effects of both agents would be greater in rats with cerebral infarction and sham-operated rats after peripheral administration, but that tolterodine and atropine would exert similar effects after central administration. Bladder capacity was markedly reduced following cerebral infarction. Low-dose i.v. tolterodine (<or=20 nmol/kg) significantly reversed this effect without altering residual volume or bladder contraction pressure. Low-dose i.v. atropine (2 nmol/kg) had no effect on bladder capacity but significantly decreased bladder contraction pressure. Higher doses of i.v. atropine (>or=20 nmol/kg) significantly increased bladder capacity but also significantly increased residual volume and decreased bladder contraction pressure. Tolterodine was significantly more efficacious than atropine in increasing bladder capacity, whereas atropine produced significantly greater increases in residual volume and reductions in bladder contraction pressure; these treatment group differences were also observed in sham-operated animals. Tolterodine and atropine administered i.c.v. significantly increased bladder capacity following cerebral infarction or sham surgery; however, this was accompanied by significantly increased residual volume and decreased bladder contraction time. The decrease in bladder contraction time was significantly smaller after tolterodine vs atropine. Peripherally acting muscarinic receptor antagonists may be preferable to centrally acting agents for minimizing adverse events, such as incomplete bladder emptying, even in individuals with compromised blood-brain barrier function.
毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂因其对膀胱功能的外周治疗作用而在临床上使用。然而,这些药物也可能作用于中枢毒蕈碱受体,尤其是在血脑屏障功能受损的个体中。我们比较了阿托品和托特罗定分别经外周(静脉内[i.v.])和中枢(脑室内[i.c.v.])给药后对大脑中动脉闭塞或假手术诱导的脑梗死清醒大鼠膀胱测压的影响,阿托品和托特罗定分别是易于和不易穿过血脑屏障的药物。我们假设托特罗定对膀胱容量的改善更大,对膀胱收缩力的损害更小,并且两种药物在外周给药后对脑梗死大鼠和假手术大鼠的作用会更大,但托特罗定和阿托品在中枢给药后会产生相似的效果。脑梗死后膀胱容量明显减少。低剂量静脉注射托特罗定(≤20 nmol/kg)可显著逆转这种效应,而不改变残余尿量或膀胱收缩压。低剂量静脉注射阿托品(2 nmol/kg)对膀胱容量无影响,但显著降低膀胱收缩压。更高剂量的静脉注射阿托品(≥20 nmol/kg)显著增加膀胱容量,但也显著增加残余尿量并降低膀胱收缩压。在增加膀胱容量方面,托特罗定比阿托品显著更有效,而阿托品使残余尿量显著增加且膀胱收缩压降低更明显;在假手术动物中也观察到了这些治疗组差异。脑梗死或假手术后,脑室内注射托特罗定和阿托品显著增加膀胱容量;然而,这伴随着残余尿量显著增加和膀胱收缩时间缩短。与阿托品相比,托特罗定给药后膀胱收缩时间的缩短明显更小。即使在血脑屏障功能受损的个体中,外周作用的毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂可能比中枢作用的药物更适合将诸如膀胱排空不完全等不良事件降至最低。