Basu Rita, Shah Pankaj, Basu Ananda, Norby Barbara, Dicke Betty, Chandramouli Visvanathan, Cohen Ohad, Landau Bernard R, Rizza Robert A
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Room 5-194 Joseph, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Diabetes. 2008 Jan;57(1):24-31. doi: 10.2337/db07-0827. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
To determine mechanisms by which pioglitazone and metformin effect hepatic and extra-hepatic insulin action.
Thirty-one subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to pioglitazone (45 mg) or metformin (2,000 mg) for 4 months.
Glucose was clamped before and after therapy at approximately 5 mmol/l, insulin raised to approximately 180 pmol/l, C-peptide suppressed with somatostatin, glucagon replaced at approximately 75 pg/ml, and glycerol maintained at approximately 200 mmol/l to ensure comparable and equal portal concentrations on all occasions. Insulin-induced stimulation of glucose disappearance did not differ before and after treatment with either pioglitazone (23 +/- 3 vs. 24 +/- 2 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or metformin (22 +/- 2 vs. 24 +/- 3 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)). In contrast, pioglitazone enhanced (P < 0.01) insulin-induced suppression of both glucose production (6.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 0.2 +/- 1.6 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and gluconeogenesis (n = 11; 4.5 +/- 0.9 vs. 0.8 +/- 1.2 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Metformin did not alter either suppression of glucose production (5.8 +/- 1.0 vs. 5.0 +/- 0.8 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or gluconeogenesis (n = 9; 3.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.7 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Insulin-induced suppression of free fatty acids was greater (P < 0.05) after treatment with pioglitazone (0.14 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.06 +/- 0.01 mmol/l) but unchanged with metformin (0.12 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.07 mmol/l).
Thus, relative to metformin, pioglitazone improves hepatic insulin action in people with type 2 diabetes, partly by enhancing insulin-induced suppression of gluconeogenesis. On the other hand, both drugs have comparable effects on insulin-induced stimulation of glucose uptake.
确定吡格列酮和二甲双胍影响肝脏及肝外胰岛素作用的机制。
31名2型糖尿病患者被随机分配接受吡格列酮(45毫克)或二甲双胍(2000毫克)治疗4个月。
治疗前后将血糖钳定在约5毫摩尔/升,将胰岛素升至约180皮摩尔/升,用生长抑素抑制C肽,将胰高血糖素补充至约75皮克/毫升,并将甘油维持在约200毫摩尔/升,以确保所有情况下门静脉浓度可比且相等。用吡格列酮(23±3对24±2微摩尔·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)或二甲双胍(22±2对24±3微摩尔·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)治疗前后,胰岛素诱导的葡萄糖消失刺激无差异。相比之下,吡格列酮增强了(P<0.01)胰岛素诱导的葡萄糖生成抑制(6.0±1.0对0.2±1.6微摩尔·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)和糖异生抑制(n = 11;4.5±0.9对0.8±1.2微摩尔·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)。二甲双胍对葡萄糖生成抑制(5.8±1.0对5.0±0.8微摩尔·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)或糖异生抑制(n = 9;3.7±0.8对2.6±0.7微摩尔·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)均无改变。用吡格列酮治疗后,胰岛素诱导的游离脂肪酸抑制作用更强(P<0.05)(0.14±0.03对0.06±0.01毫摩尔/升),而用二甲双胍治疗则无变化(0.12±0.03对0.15±0.07毫摩尔/升)。
因此,相对于二甲双胍,吡格列酮可改善2型糖尿病患者的肝脏胰岛素作用,部分是通过增强胰岛素诱导的糖异生抑制。另一方面,两种药物对胰岛素诱导的葡萄糖摄取刺激作用相当。