Mazeh Doron, Shahal Baruch, Aviv Alex, Zemishlani Hanna, Barak Yoram
Abarbanel Mental Health Center, Bat-Yam, Israel.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Nov;22(6):371-5. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32817396ae.
It is estimated that up to 45% of patients with depression do not have an adequate response to a first trial of antidepressant therapy with even higher reported rates for the elderly patients. To compare the efficacy and the tolerability of venlafaxine vs. paroxetine in elderly patients suffering from resistant major depression, who did not respond to at least two previous adequate trials of antidepressants. Patients entered an 8-week single-blind study. Patients were rated using the Clinical Global Impression Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and the Geriatric Depression Scale. Assessments were performed at baseline and on days 7, 14, 21, 28, 42 and 56. Side effects were recorded in a systemic manner. Thirty patients were included in the study, (17 women, 13 men; mean age=75.9 years, range: 68-83) and all had completed the 6-week trial. Mean dose of venlafaxine used was 165 mg/day (SD=73.8; range 75-300 mg). Mean dose of paroxetine used was 26 mg/day (SD=15.04; range 10-60 mg). Nine patients treated with venlafaxine (60%) and five patients treated with paroxetine (33%) remitted after 8 weeks of treatment. Four patients treated with venlafaxine and eight patients treated with paroxetine failed to respond. Significant improvement in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores between baseline and endpoint were observed in both groups of patients. The mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression change for paroxetine was -12.5 and for venlafaxine -19.1 (P<0.05). The mean Geriatric Depression Scale change for paroxetine was -3.2 and for venlafaxine -6.0 (P<0.3). The mean Clinical Global Impression Scale change was -2.3 for paroxetine and -3.5 for venlafaxine (P<0.05). Venlafaxine was significantly superior to paroxetine on Clinical Global Impression Scale and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression measures. Side effects were transient and did not differ between treatment groups. Elderly depressed patients resistant to previous treatments had responded to a trial of paroxetine or venlafaxine. Remission rates were higher for venlafaxine and tolerability was acceptable for both compounds.
据估计,高达45%的抑郁症患者对首次抗抑郁治疗试验没有充分反应,老年患者的报告率甚至更高。为了比较文拉法辛与帕罗西汀在患有难治性重度抑郁症的老年患者中的疗效和耐受性,这些患者对至少两次先前充分的抗抑郁药试验均无反应。患者进入一项为期8周的单盲研究。使用临床总体印象量表、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表和老年抑郁量表对患者进行评分。在基线以及第7、14、21、28、42和56天进行评估。以系统的方式记录副作用。30名患者纳入研究(17名女性,13名男性;平均年龄 = 75.9岁,范围:68 - 83岁),且所有患者均完成了为期6周的试验。所用文拉法辛的平均剂量为165毫克/天(标准差 = 73.8;范围75 - 300毫克)。所用帕罗西汀的平均剂量为26毫克/天(标准差 = 15.04;范围10 - 60毫克)。接受文拉法辛治疗的9名患者(60%)和接受帕罗西汀治疗的5名患者(33%)在治疗8周后病情缓解。4名接受文拉法辛治疗的患者和8名接受帕罗西汀治疗的患者无反应。两组患者在基线和终点之间的汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表评分均有显著改善。帕罗西汀的汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表平均变化为 -12.5,文拉法辛为 -19.1(P < 0.05)。帕罗西汀的老年抑郁量表平均变化为 -3.2,文拉法辛为 -6.0(P < 0.3)。临床总体印象量表平均变化,帕罗西汀为 -2.3,文拉法辛为 -3.5(P < 0.05)。在临床总体印象量表和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表测量方面,文拉法辛显著优于帕罗西汀。副作用是短暂的,且治疗组之间无差异。对先前治疗有抵抗性的老年抑郁症患者对帕罗西汀或文拉法辛试验有反应。文拉法辛的缓解率更高,两种药物的耐受性均可接受。