Braeckman Johan, Autier Philippe, Garbar Christian, Marichal Miriam Pipeleers, Soviany Cristina, Nir Rina, Nir Dror, Michielsen Dirk, Bleiberg Harry, Egevad Lars, Emberton Mark
Academic Hospital, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit, Brussels, Belgium.
BJU Int. 2008 Feb;101(3):293-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07232.x. Epub 2007 Oct 8.
To assess the extent to which prostate HistoScanning (PHS), a new ultrasound-based technology that uses computer-aided analysis to quantify tissue disorganization induced by malignant processes, can identify and characterize foci of prostate cancer compared with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.
Between September 2004 and February 2006, 29 men had PHS before their scheduled RP. A three-dimensional ultrasound raw-data file was acquired, and PHS analysed regions of interest (ROI) corresponding to tissue volumes of approximately 0.04 mL. In 13 men the histology was examined on sections of the whole-mount prostate onto which a grid of 5 x 5 mm squares was applied. On a test set of 14 of the 29 patients, PHS analysis was used before knowing the histology results (blinded data), to predict the maximum tumour diameter, focality, laterality and extraprostatic extension (EPE).
Identification and characterization by PHS of the index tumour in the 14 patients in the test set correlated closely (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) with the reference test. The concordance in the attribution of multifocality (present/absent), unilateral/bilateral disease between PHS and histology was 100%. EPE as determined by PHS was attributed to all three pT3a pathological specimens in the blinded paired data. In the same set of data, EPE was attributed to one prostate cancer that on pathological inspection was deemed to be organ-confined (pT2b).
PHS has the potential to identify and characterize prostate cancer foci noninvasively. The precision appears to be sufficient to suggest that PHS might be useful as a triage test for men deemed to be at risk of prostate cancer and who wish to avoid prostate biopsy.
评估前列腺组织扫描(PHS)这一基于超声的新技术(利用计算机辅助分析对恶性病变所致组织紊乱进行量化)与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)连续切片标本相比,在识别和表征前列腺癌病灶方面的能力。
2004年9月至2006年2月期间,29名男性在预定的RP手术前接受了PHS检查。获取了三维超声原始数据文件,PHS分析了对应于约0.04 mL组织体积的感兴趣区域(ROI)。对13名男性的全层前列腺切片进行组织学检查,这些切片上应用了5×5 mm正方形网格。在29名患者中的14名患者的测试集中,在知晓组织学结果之前(盲法数据)使用PHS分析来预测最大肿瘤直径、病灶数量、单侧或双侧性以及前列腺外侵犯(EPE)。
测试集中14名患者的索引肿瘤通过PHS进行的识别和表征与参考测试密切相关(r = 0.95,P < 0.001)。PHS与组织学在多灶性(存在/不存在)、单侧/双侧疾病归属方面的一致性为100%。在盲法配对数据中,PHS确定的EPE归因于所有三个pT3a病理标本。在同一组数据中,EPE归因于一例经病理检查被认为局限于器官内(pT2b)的前列腺癌。
PHS有潜力无创地识别和表征前列腺癌病灶。其精度似乎足以表明PHS可能作为一种分流测试,用于那些被认为有前列腺癌风险且希望避免前列腺活检的男性。