Railo Henry, Koivisto Mika, Revonsuo Antti, Hannula Minna M
Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Finland.
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):82-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
The process of rapidly and accurately enumerating small numbers of items without counting, i.e. subitizing, is often believed to rest on parallel preattentive processes. However, the possibility that enumeration of small numbers of items would also require attentional processes has remained an open question. The present study is the first that directly contrasts the preattentive and attentive models of subitizing. We used an inattentional blindness paradigm to manipulate the availability of attentional resources during enumeration. In the inattention condition, the items to be enumerated were presented unexpectedly while participants focused on a line length comparison task. Divided- and full-attention conditions were also included. The results showed that only numbers one and two could be enumerated when the effects of attention were minimized. Freeing attentional resources increased the enumeration accuracies considerably, including for number two. The results suggest that even for enumerating small numbers, the attentional demands increase as the number of objects increases.
快速且准确地清点少量物品而无需逐一计数的过程,即一眼识数,通常被认为依赖于并行的前注意过程。然而,少量物品的清点是否也需要注意过程,这一可能性仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。本研究首次直接对比了一眼识数的前注意模型和注意模型。我们使用了无意视盲范式来操纵清点过程中注意资源的可用性。在无注意条件下,当参与者专注于线长比较任务时,要清点的物品会意外呈现。还包括了分散注意和全神贯注条件。结果表明,当注意的影响最小化时,只有数字1和2能够被清点。释放注意资源显著提高了清点准确率,包括对数字2的清点。结果表明,即使是清点少量物品,随着物体数量的增加,注意需求也会增加。