Andrade Chittaranjan, Singh Nagendra M, Thyagarajan S, Nagaraja Nandakumar, Sanjay Kumar Rao N, Suresh Chandra J
Department of Psychopharmacology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
J Psychiatr Res. 2008 Aug;42(10):837-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.08.009. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
We sought to explore nonselective vs. selective COX mechanisms in ECS-induced retrograde amnesia using indomethacin and celecoxib as in vivo probes. Adult Wistar rats (n=72) which showed adequate learning on a passive avoidance task received 5 once-daily 30 mC true or sham ECS. During the learning and ECS periods, indomethacin (4 mg/kg/day), celecoxib (15 mg/kg/day), or vehicle were orally administered. One day after the fifth ECS, recall of pre-ECS learning was tested. There were no baseline or pre-ECS differences in learning between groups. ECS seizure duration did not differ across groups. ECS-treated rats showed impaired recall in the vehicle but not indomethacin and celecoxib groups. Celecoxib but not indomethacin significantly protected against ECS-induced retrograde amnesia. We interpret these results as follows: ECS may impair cognition by pathologically upregulating glutmatergic signalling, thereby causing cation and water influx, oxidative stress, and saturation of hippocampal LTP. These may result from glutamatergic disinhibition through COX-2-mediated removal of endogenous cannabinoids, and by ECS-activated, NMDA-mediated upregulation of platelet activating factor and COX-2 signalling pathways. Thus, indomethacin and celecoxib, by inhibiting COX-2, may protect against ECS-induced amnesia. Furthermore, COX-2 mediated increase in hippocampal kynurenic acid may impair glutamate-dependent learning and memory processes at ionotropic glutamatergic receptor sites; the inhibition of kynurenic acid synthesis by celecoxib and its induction by indomethacin may explain the greater benefits with celecoxib. These findings suggest new avenues for the study of the neurobiology of ECT-induced amnesia and the attenuation thereof.
我们试图使用吲哚美辛和塞来昔布作为体内探针,探讨非选择性与选择性COX机制在电惊厥休克(ECS)诱导的逆行性遗忘中的作用。在被动回避任务中表现出充分学习能力的成年Wistar大鼠(n = 72)接受5次每日一次、强度为30 mC的真ECS或假ECS。在学习和ECS期间,口服吲哚美辛(4 mg/kg/天)、塞来昔布(15 mg/kg/天)或赋形剂。在第五次ECS后一天,测试对ECS前学习的回忆。各组之间在学习的基线或ECS前没有差异。ECS发作持续时间在各组之间没有差异。接受ECS治疗的大鼠在赋形剂组中表现出回忆受损,但在吲哚美辛和塞来昔布组中没有。塞来昔布而非吲哚美辛显著保护大鼠免受ECS诱导的逆行性遗忘。我们对这些结果的解释如下:ECS可能通过病理性上调谷氨酸能信号传导来损害认知,从而导致阳离子和水内流、氧化应激以及海马长时程增强(LTP)的饱和。这些可能是由于通过COX - 2介导的内源性大麻素清除导致的谷氨酸能去抑制,以及ECS激活的、NMDA介导的血小板活化因子和COX - 2信号通路的上调。因此,吲哚美辛和塞来昔布通过抑制COX - 2,可能预防ECS诱导的失忆。此外,COX - 2介导的海马犬尿氨酸增加可能在离子型谷氨酸能受体位点损害谷氨酸依赖的学习和记忆过程;塞来昔布对犬尿氨酸合成的抑制及其被吲哚美辛诱导可能解释了塞来昔布的更大益处。这些发现为研究电休克治疗(ECT)诱导的失忆及其减弱的神经生物学提供了新途径。