Salsich Gretchen B, Perman William H
Department of Physical Therapy, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO 63104, USA.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Sep;37(9):521-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.37.9.521.
Observational, cohort study.
To test the hypothesis that patellar alignment and tibiofemoral rotation alignment explain unique portions of variance in patellofemoral joint contact area in individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and in pain-free control subjects.
PFP has been proposed to result from increased patellofemoral joint stress due to decreased contact area. Patellar malalignment (lateral displacement and tilt) is believed to be the main contributor to decreased contact area. Recent studies suggest that transverse plane rotation of the femur and/or tibia may also contribute to decreased contact area.
Twenty-one subjects with PFP (16 female, 5 male) and 21 pain-free subjects (14 female, 7 male) participated. Subjects underwent magnetic resonance imaging with the knee in full extension and the quadriceps contracted. Measures of patellofemoral joint contact area, lateral patellar displacement, patellar tilt angle, tibiofemoral rotation angle, and patellar width were obtained. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed for each group using contact area as the dependent variable. The order of independent variables was patellar width, patellar tilt angle, and tibiofemoral rotation angle. To avoid multicolinearity, lateral patellar displacement was not included.
In the PFP group, patellar width and tibiofemoral rotation angle explained 46% of the variance in contact area. In pain-free subjects, patellar width was the only predictor of contact area, explaining 31% of its variance. Patellar tilt angle did not predict contact area in either group.
Addressing factors that control tibiofemoral rotation may be indicated to increase contact area and reduce pain in individuals with PFP. Future studies should investigate the contributions of patellar alignment and tibiofemoral rotation to patellofemoral joint contact area at a variety of knee flexion angles.
观察性队列研究。
检验以下假设,即髌股关节对线和胫股旋转对线可解释髌股疼痛(PFP)患者和无痛对照受试者髌股关节接触面积变异的独特部分。
有人提出PFP是由于接触面积减小导致髌股关节应力增加所致。髌股关节对线不良(外侧移位和倾斜)被认为是接触面积减小的主要原因。最近的研究表明,股骨和/或胫骨的横向平面旋转也可能导致接触面积减小。
21例PFP患者(16例女性,5例男性)和21例无痛受试者(14例女性,7例男性)参与研究。受试者在膝关节完全伸展且股四头肌收缩的状态下接受磁共振成像检查。获取髌股关节接触面积、髌骨外侧移位、髌骨倾斜角、胫股旋转角和髌骨宽度的测量值。对每组以接触面积为因变量进行分层多元回归分析。自变量的顺序为髌骨宽度、髌骨倾斜角和胫股旋转角。为避免多重共线性,未纳入髌骨外侧移位。
在PFP组中,髌骨宽度和胫股旋转角解释了接触面积变异的46%。在无痛受试者中,髌骨宽度是接触面积的唯一预测因素,解释了其31%的变异。髌骨倾斜角在两组中均不能预测接触面积。
对于PFP患者,可能需要处理控制胫股旋转的因素以增加接触面积并减轻疼痛。未来的研究应调查在各种膝关节屈曲角度下,髌股关节对线和胫股旋转对髌股关节接触面积的影响。