Chen W, Liu J, Gluud C
Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Liver Clinic, Room 181, 6B Fell Pav, 399 Bathurst St, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD003181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003181.pub2.
Trials have assessed bile acids for patients with viral hepatitis, but no consensus has been reached regarding their usefulness.
To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of bile acids for viral hepatitis.
Searches were performed in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (July 2007), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (July 2007), EMBASE (July 2007), Science Citation Index Expanded (July 2007), and Chinese Biomedical Database (July 2007).
Randomised clinical trials comparing any dose or duration of bile acids versus placebo or no intervention for viral hepatitis were included, irrespective of language, publication status, or blinding. Co-interventions were allowed in the included randomised clinical trials.
Two authors extracted the data independently. The methodological quality of the trials was evaluated with respect to generation of the allocation sequence, allocation concealment, double blinding, and follow-up. The outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR) or weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
We identified 29 randomised trials of bile acids for hepatitis B or C; none were of high methodological quality. We were unable to extract data from two trials. In one trial, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) versus placebo for acute hepatitis B significantly reduced the risk of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity at the end of treatment and serum HBV DNA level at the end of follow-up. In another trial, UDCA versus no intervention for chronic hepatitis B significantly reduced the risk of having abnormal serum transaminase activities at the end of treatment. Twenty-five trials compared bile acids (21 trials UDCA; four trials tauro-UDCA) versus placebo or no intervention with or without co-interventions for chronic hepatitis C. Bile acids did not significantly reduce the risk of having detectable serum HCV RNA (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07), cirrhosis, or portal and periportal inflammation score at the end of treatment. Bile acids significantly decreased the risk of having abnormal serum alanine aminotransferase activity at the end of treatment (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90) and follow-up (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98). Bile acids significantly increased the Knodell score (WMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.31) at the end of treatment. No severe adverse events were reported. We did not identify trials including patients with hepatitis A, acute hepatitis C, hepatitis D, or hepatitis E.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Bile acids lead to a significant improvement in serum transaminase activities in hepatitis B and C but have no effects on the clearance of virus. There is insufficient evidence either to support or to refute effects on long-term outcomes including hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic decompensation, and liver related mortality. Randomised trials with high methodological quality are required before clinical use is considered.
已有多项试验评估了胆汁酸对病毒性肝炎患者的疗效,但对于其有效性尚未达成共识。
评估胆汁酸对病毒性肝炎的有益和有害影响。
检索了Cochrane肝胆疾病组对照试验注册库(2007年7月)、Cochrane图书馆(2007年第1期)、MEDLINE(2007年7月)、EMBASE(2007年7月)、科学引文索引扩展版(2007年7月)和中国生物医学数据库(2007年7月)。
纳入比较任何剂量或疗程的胆汁酸与安慰剂或未进行干预治疗病毒性肝炎的随机临床试验,无论语言、发表状态或是否采用盲法。纳入的随机临床试验允许联合干预。
两位作者独立提取数据。从分配序列的产生、分配隐藏、双盲和随访方面评估试验的方法学质量。结果以相对危险度(RR)或加权均数差(WMD)及95%置信区间(CI)表示。
我们确定了29项关于胆汁酸治疗乙型或丙型肝炎的随机试验;均未达到较高的方法学质量。我们无法从两项试验中提取数据。在一项试验中,熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)与安慰剂治疗急性乙型肝炎相比,显著降低了治疗结束时乙肝表面抗原阳性的风险以及随访结束时血清HBV DNA水平。在另一项试验中,UDCA与未进行干预治疗慢性乙型肝炎相比,显著降低了治疗结束时血清转氨酶活性异常的风险。25项试验比较了胆汁酸(21项试验为UDCA;4项试验为牛磺熊去氧胆酸)与安慰剂或未进行干预治疗慢性丙型肝炎,无论是否联合干预。胆汁酸并未显著降低治疗结束时血清HCV RNA可检测的风险(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.91至1.07)、肝硬化风险或门脉及门脉周围炎症评分。胆汁酸显著降低了治疗结束时血清丙氨酸转氨酶活性异常的风险(RR 0.82,95%CI 0.76至0.90)以及随访时的风险(RR 0.91,95%CI 0.85至0.98)。胆汁酸显著增加了治疗结束时的Knodell评分(WMD 0.20,95%CI 0.08至0.31)。未报告严重不良事件。我们未找到纳入甲型肝炎、急性丙型肝炎、丁型肝炎或戊型肝炎患者的试验。
胆汁酸可使乙型和丙型肝炎患者的血清转氨酶活性显著改善,但对病毒清除无作用。目前尚无充分证据支持或反驳其对包括肝细胞癌、肝失代偿和肝脏相关死亡率等长期结局的影响。在考虑临床应用之前,需要进行方法学质量较高的随机试验。