Wildes Jennifer E, Marcus Marsha D, Fagiolini Andrea
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Compr Psychiatry. 2007 Nov-Dec;48(6):516-21. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
The objectives of the study were to evaluate the clinical significance of lifetime eating disorder comorbidity in a well-defined sample of patients with bipolar spectrum disorders and to describe cognitive correlates of disordered eating in this group.
Twenty-six bipolar patients with a lifetime history of a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)-defined eating disorder (n = 17) or a clinically significant subthreshold eating disorder (n = 9) (ED group) were compared with 46 bipolar patients with no history of an eating disorder (no-ED group) on demographic and clinical characteristics at study presentation, history of bipolar illness, and other psychiatric comorbidity. Measures included the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale-Bipolar Version (CGI-S-BP), and the Eating Disorder Examination. Height and weight were recorded to calculate body mass index.
Patients in the ED group were heavier and were rated as more symptomatic on the CGI-S-BP than were patients in the no-ED group. The ED group also had a higher number of lifetime depressive episodes and greater psychiatric comorbidity, excluding eating and mood disorders. Finally, after controlling for body mass index and CGI-S-BP rating, patients in the ED group had significantly higher Eating Disorder Examination Restraint, Eating Concern, Shape Concern, Weight Concern, and Global scores than did patients in the no-ED group.
These findings highlight the need for a renewed emphasis on the evaluation and management of weight and eating in the mood disorders. In particular, this research suggests that eating disorder comorbidity may be a marker for increased symptom load and illness burden in bipolar disorder.
本研究的目的是评估双相谱系障碍患者明确样本中终身饮食失调共病的临床意义,并描述该组中饮食失调的认知相关因素。
将26名有《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)定义的终身饮食失调史(n = 17)或具有临床意义的阈下饮食失调史(n = 9)的双相情感障碍患者(饮食失调组)与46名无饮食失调史的双相情感障碍患者(无饮食失调组)在研究呈现时的人口统计学和临床特征、双相情感障碍病史以及其他精神共病方面进行比较。测量指标包括DSM-IV轴I障碍的结构化临床访谈、临床总体印象-严重程度量表-双相情感障碍版(CGI-S-BP)以及饮食失调检查。记录身高和体重以计算体重指数。
饮食失调组的患者比无饮食失调组的患者体重更重,并且在CGI-S-BP上的症状评分更高。饮食失调组终身抑郁发作的次数也更多,且精神共病更多,不包括饮食和情绪障碍。最后,在控制体重指数和CGI-S-BP评分后,饮食失调组患者的饮食失调检查抑制、饮食关注、体型关注、体重关注和总体得分显著高于无饮食失调组患者。
这些发现强调了需要重新重视情绪障碍中体重和饮食的评估与管理。特别是,这项研究表明饮食失调共病可能是双相情感障碍症状负荷和疾病负担增加的一个标志。