Gupta Vinay, Samuleson Christian G, Su Susan, Chen Thomas C
Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23(4):E9. doi: 10.3171/FOC-07/10/E9.
Although most meningiomas are treated surgically, it may not be possible to completely remove atypical, malignant, and surgically inaccessible meningiomas; in the majority of these cases there is tumor recurrence. The authors have already reported initial preclinical results on the efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of meningiomas; however, a recent Phase II trial of imatinib in patients with recurrent meningiomas did not demonstrate significant antitumor activity. To enhance the activity of imatinib, the authors investigated the use of a combination therapy with nelfinavir on primary meningioma cells and meningioma cell lines IOMM-Lee and CH157. Cytotoxicity was measured using methylthiotetrazole and colony formation assays. In low-dose combination therapy with imatinib, nelfinavir potentiated the antiproliferative and anti-colony formation effects of imatinib. Primary meningioma cells responded better to combination therapy than to imatinib alone. Treatment induced a dose-dependent antiproliferative effect, decreased cell survival, and inhibited colony formation. Western blotting demonstrated decreased levels of survivin protein on combination therapy. Because meningiomas have very high levels of survivin protein, survivin inhibition by nelfinavir may represent a potential mechanism for the additive effect observed with imatinib. Moreover, an increase in the proapoptotic Bax/Bcl-2 protein ratio was demonstrated with the combination of imatinib and nelfinavir. The authors propose that nelfinavir not only potentiates imatinib efficacy, it also abrogates resistance to imatinib by decreasing survivin protein levels in meningiomas. In an in vivo assay, this combination therapy was found to be more effective than imatinib alone. More preclinical work with in vivo models is needed to determine if this new combination therapy will translate into a viable future therapy for meningiomas.
虽然大多数脑膜瘤通过手术治疗,但对于非典型、恶性以及手术难以触及的脑膜瘤,可能无法完全切除;在大多数此类病例中会出现肿瘤复发。作者已经报告了伊马替尼治疗脑膜瘤疗效的初步临床前结果;然而,最近一项针对复发性脑膜瘤患者的伊马替尼II期试验并未显示出显著的抗肿瘤活性。为了增强伊马替尼的活性,作者研究了奈非那韦与伊马替尼联合治疗对原发性脑膜瘤细胞以及脑膜瘤细胞系IOMM-Lee和CH157的作用。使用甲基硫代四氮唑和集落形成试验来测定细胞毒性。在与伊马替尼的低剂量联合治疗中,奈非那韦增强了伊马替尼的抗增殖和抗集落形成作用。原发性脑膜瘤细胞对联合治疗的反应比对单独使用伊马替尼更好。治疗诱导了剂量依赖性的抗增殖作用,降低了细胞存活率,并抑制了集落形成。蛋白质印迹法显示联合治疗时生存素蛋白水平降低。由于脑膜瘤中生存素蛋白水平非常高,奈非那韦对生存素的抑制可能是观察到的与伊马替尼联合使用时相加效应的潜在机制。此外,伊马替尼和奈非那韦联合使用时促凋亡的Bax/Bcl-2蛋白比率增加。作者提出,奈非那韦不仅增强了伊马替尼的疗效,还通过降低脑膜瘤中生存素蛋白水平消除了对伊马替尼的耐药性。在体内试验中,发现这种联合治疗比单独使用伊马替尼更有效。需要更多使用体内模型的临床前研究来确定这种新的联合治疗是否会转化为脑膜瘤可行的未来治疗方法。