Maecken Tim, Zenz Michael, Grau Thomas
Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Palliative Care & Pain Medicine, BG University Clinics Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;32(5):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2007.07.002.
Needle visibility is a crucial requirement for successful and safe ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks. We performed a prospective study on the ultrasonic imaging quality of various commercially available needles. We tested the hypothesis that different nerve block needles would have different ultrasonic appearances. Furthermore, we examined the influence of needle angle with regard to the ultrasound plane, 2 types of media surrounding the needle, and the impact of 3 different ultrasound machines.
Twelve needles were prospectively tested for 3 ultrasound planes (longitudinal, axial tip, and axial shaft) at 2 different angles (0 degrees and 45 degrees). Quality of needle visibility and ultrasound scans were described by using 6 criteria (visibility score range 0-10): (1) visibility of needle; (2) visibility of surrounding media; (3) consistency of needle surface; (4) formation of artifacts; (5) degree of shadowing; and (6) detection and distinction of the needle from the surrounding media. Additionally, every ultrasound scan was performed in 2 media (water bath and animal model) with 3 ultrasound devices and evaluated by 2 investigators. Evaluation of the ultrasound scans was blinded with regard to needle but not to the ultrasound machine and media.
In the animal model, visibility was good at 0 degrees (visibility score greater than 6) but was decreased for all needles at a 45 degree angle (criterion 6). In this setting, 2 needles were difficult to identify (score less than 3; criterion 6) and only 3 of 12 reached a score of 7 or more (criterion 6). Depiction quality for all 3 planes was significantly lower in the animal model when compared with the water bath (P < .001) and at an angle of 45 degrees when compared with 0 degrees (P < .001). There was no significant impact of the ultrasound machine on image quality.
In a tissue-equivalent model we found significant differences among different types of needles at a 45 degree angle. In clinical use, angles between 30 degrees and 60 degrees are required. Because visibility of the needle is a keystone of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks, our results suggest the need to optimize the echogenicity of needles used for ultrasound-guided nerve blocks.
针的可视性是成功且安全地进行超声引导下外周神经阻滞的关键要求。我们对各种市售针的超声成像质量进行了一项前瞻性研究。我们检验了不同神经阻滞针会有不同超声表现的假设。此外,我们研究了针与超声平面的角度、针周围两种介质以及三台不同超声设备的影响。
前瞻性地对12根针在3个超声平面(纵向、轴向针尖和轴向上)以2个不同角度(0度和45度)进行测试。针的可视性和超声扫描质量用6项标准描述(可视性评分范围0 - 10):(1)针的可视性;(2)周围介质的可视性;(3)针表面的一致性;(4)伪像的形成;(5)阴影程度;(6)针与周围介质的检测与区分。此外,每次超声扫描在2种介质(水浴和动物模型)中使用3台超声设备进行,并由2名研究者评估。超声扫描的评估对针是盲法,但对超声设备和介质不是盲法。
在动物模型中,0度时可视性良好(可视性评分大于6),但所有针在45度角时可视性降低(标准6)。在此情况下,2根针难以识别(评分小于3;标准6),12根针中只有3根达到7分或更高(标准6)。与水浴相比,动物模型中所有3个平面的描绘质量显著更低(P <.001),与0度相比,45度角时描绘质量显著更低(P <.001)。超声设备对图像质量无显著影响。
在组织等效模型中,我们发现在45度角时不同类型的针之间存在显著差异。在临床应用中,需要30度至60度之间的角度。由于针的可视性是超声引导下外周神经阻滞的关键,我们的结果表明需要优化用于超声引导神经阻滞的针的回声性。