Ramsey Dan K, Briem Kristin, Axe Michael J, Snyder-Mackler Lynn
Department of Exercise and Nutrition Science, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 214 Kimball Tower, South Campus, Buffalo, NY 14214-8028, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Nov;89(11):2398-407. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01136.
Evidence that knee braces used for the treatment of osteoarthritis mediate pain relief and improve function by unloading the joint (increasing the joint separation) remains inconclusive. Alternatively, valgus-producing braces may mediate pain relief by mechanically stabilizing the joint and reducing muscle cocontractions and joint compression. In this study, therefore, we sought to examine the degree to which so-called unloader braces control knee instability and influence muscle cocontractions during gait.
Sixteen subjects with radiographic evidence of knee malalignment and medial compartment osteoarthritis were recruited and fitted with a custom Generation II Unloader brace. Gait analysis was performed without use of the brace and with the brace in neutral alignment and in 4 degrees of valgus alignment. A two-week washout period separated the brace conditions. Muscle cocontraction indices were derived for agonist and antagonist muscle pairings. Pain, instability, and functional status were obtained with use of self-reported questionnaires, and the results were compared.
The scores for pain, function, and stability were worst when the knee was unsupported (the baseline and washout conditions). At baseline, nine of the sixteen patients reported knee instability and five of the nine complained that it affected their activities of daily living. Poor knee stability was found to be correlated with low ratings for the activities of daily living, quality of life, and global knee function and with increased pain and symptoms. Knee function and stability scored best with the brace in the neutral setting compared with the brace in the valgus setting. The cocontraction of the vastus lateralis-lateral hamstrings was significantly reduced from baseline in both the neutral (p = 0.014) and valgus conditions (p = 0.023), and the cocontraction of the vastus medialis-medial hamstrings was significantly reduced with the valgus setting (p = 0.068), as a result of bracing. Patients with greater varus alignment had greater decreases in vastus lateralis-lateral hamstring muscle cocontraction.
When knees with medial compartment osteoarthritis are braced, neutral alignment performs as well as or better than valgus alignment in reducing pain, disability, muscle cocontraction, and knee adduction excursions. Pain relief may result from diminished muscle cocontractions rather than from so-called medial compartment unloading.
用于治疗骨关节炎的膝关节支具通过减轻关节负荷(增加关节间隙)来缓解疼痛和改善功能,这一证据尚无定论。另外,产生外翻的支具可能通过机械稳定关节、减少肌肉共同收缩和关节压迫来缓解疼痛。因此,在本研究中,我们试图探究所谓的卸载支具在多大程度上控制膝关节不稳定以及影响步态期间的肌肉共同收缩。
招募了16名有膝关节排列不齐和内侧间室骨关节炎影像学证据的受试者,并为其佩戴定制的第二代卸载支具。在不使用支具以及支具处于中立位和4度外翻位的情况下进行步态分析。两种支具状态之间有两周的洗脱期。得出主动肌和拮抗肌配对的肌肉共同收缩指数。使用自我报告问卷获取疼痛、不稳定和功能状态信息,并对结果进行比较。
在膝关节无支撑时(基线和洗脱期状态),疼痛、功能和稳定性评分最差。在基线时,16名患者中有9名报告有膝关节不稳定,其中9名中有5名抱怨这影响了他们的日常生活活动。发现膝关节稳定性差与日常生活活动、生活质量和整体膝关节功能评分低以及疼痛和症状增加相关。与支具处于外翻位相比,支具处于中立位时膝关节功能和稳定性评分最佳。由于佩戴支具,股外侧肌 - 外侧腘绳肌的共同收缩在中立位(p = 0.014)和外翻位(p = 0.023)均较基线显著降低,股内侧肌 - 内侧腘绳肌的共同收缩在支具处于外翻位时显著降低(p = 0.068)。内翻排列程度越大的患者,股外侧肌 - 外侧腘绳肌的共同收缩降低幅度越大。
对于内侧间室骨关节炎的膝关节,佩戴支具时,中立位在减轻疼痛、残疾、肌肉共同收缩和膝关节内收偏移方面的效果与外翻位相同或更好。疼痛缓解可能是由于肌肉共同收缩减少,而非所谓的内侧间室卸载。