Saunders Brian R, Turner Michael L
Polymer Science and Engineering Group, School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Grosvenor Street, Manchester, M1 7HS, UK.
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2008 Apr 21;138(1):1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 5.
The need to develop and deploy large-scale, cost-effective, renewable energy is becoming increasingly important. In recent years photovoltaic (PV) cells based on nanoparticles blended with semiconducting polymers have achieved good power conversion efficiencies (PCE). All the nanoparticle types used in these PV cells can be considered as colloids. These include spherical, rod-like or branched organic or inorganic nanoparticles. Nanoparticle-polymer PV cells have the long-term potential to provide low cost, high-efficiency renewable energy. The maximum PCE achieved to date is about 5.5%. This value should rise as recently reported theoretical predictions suggest 10% is achievable. However, there are a number of challenges that remain to be overcome. In this review two general types of nanoparticle-polymer PV cells are considered and compared in detail. The organic nanoparticle-polymer PV cells contain fullerene derivatives (e.g., phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester, PCBM) or single-walled nanotubes as the nanoparticle phase. The second type is hybrid inorganic nanoparticle-polymer PV cells. These contain semiconducting nanoparticles that include CdSe, ZnO or PbS. The structure-property relationships that apply to both the polymer and nanoparticle phases are considered. The principles underlying nanoparticle-polymer PV cell operation are also discussed. An outcome of consideration of the literature in both areas are two sets of assembly conditions that are suggested for constructing PCBM-P3HT (P3HT is poly(3-hexylthiophene)) or CdSe-P3HT PV cells with reasonable power conversion efficiency. The maximum PCE reported for organic nanoparticle PV cells is about twice that for inorganic nanoparticle-polymer PV cells. This appears to be related to morphological differences between the respective photoactive layers. The morphological differences are attributed to differences in the colloidal stability of the nanoparticle/polymer/solvent mixtures used to prepare the photoactive layers. The principles controlling the colloid stability of the nanoparticle/polymer/solvent mixtures are discussed.
开发和部署大规模、经济高效的可再生能源变得越来越重要。近年来,基于与半导体聚合物混合的纳米颗粒的光伏(PV)电池已实现了良好的功率转换效率(PCE)。这些PV电池中使用的所有纳米颗粒类型都可被视为胶体。这包括球形、棒状或分支状的有机或无机纳米颗粒。纳米颗粒-聚合物PV电池具有提供低成本、高效率可再生能源的长期潜力。迄今为止实现的最大PCE约为5.5%。随着最近报道的理论预测表明可达到10%,这个值应该会上升。然而,仍有许多挑战有待克服。在这篇综述中,详细考虑并比较了两种一般类型的纳米颗粒-聚合物PV电池。有机纳米颗粒-聚合物PV电池包含富勒烯衍生物(例如苯基C61-丁酸甲酯,PCBM)或单壁纳米管作为纳米颗粒相。第二种类型是混合无机纳米颗粒-聚合物PV电池。这些包含半导体纳米颗粒,包括CdSe、ZnO或PbS。考虑了适用于聚合物和纳米颗粒相的结构-性能关系。还讨论了纳米颗粒-聚合物PV电池运行的基本原理。对这两个领域文献的考虑结果是提出了两组组装条件,用于构建具有合理功率转换效率的PCBM-P3HT(P3HT是聚(3-己基噻吩))或CdSe-P3HT PV电池。报道的有机纳米颗粒PV电池的最大PCE约为无机纳米颗粒-聚合物PV电池的两倍。这似乎与各自光活性层之间的形态差异有关。形态差异归因于用于制备光活性层的纳米颗粒/聚合物/溶剂混合物的胶体稳定性差异。讨论了控制纳米颗粒/聚合物/溶剂混合物胶体稳定性的原理。