Mokhtar S A, Guirguis W W, al-Torkey M M, Aziz Khalaf A
High Institute of Public Health, Ministry of Public Health, Kuwait.
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 1991;66(5-6):693-722.
The present study was undertaken with the aim of developing and testing an instrument that could be used to measure patient satisfaction with hospital services in Kuwait. The instrument, which comprised 57 items, and measured satisfaction with 7 specific dimensions of hospital services, was administered to 493 patients using the interview technique. Statistical analysis showed that the instrument yields good response variability. Reliability of the instrument, measured in terms of the internal consistency coefficient alpha, exceeded the acceptable criterion level, the coefficients ranging between 0.73 and 0.86. Evidence of the construct validity of the instrument was found in significant positive correlation between the dimension specific satisfaction scale scores and scores for allegiance scale and for overall rating of quality of hospital services. Construct validity was further supported by convergent discriminant analysis, which showed that correlations between items of all 7 scales and their total scale scores were greater than correlations between scale items and the total scores of scales they do not represent. Analysis of an open-ended question about dissatisfying aspects of hospital services not included on the interview was undertaken to examine the instrument's content validity. Results indicated that patients identified 11 items, 8 of which were identified more than once, and 2 of which were not classifiable to the 7 dimensions assessed by the instrument. It was suggested to add the 8 items that were identified more than once, and to reassess the reliability and validity of the revised instrument. Assessment of the test-retest reliability, by comparing scale scores over time, was also suggested.
本研究旨在开发并测试一种可用于衡量科威特患者对医院服务满意度的工具。该工具包含57个项目,用于测量患者对医院服务7个特定维度的满意度,采用访谈技术对493名患者进行了调查。统计分析表明,该工具具有良好的反应变异性。以内部一致性系数α衡量的工具可靠性超过了可接受的标准水平,系数在0.73至0.86之间。在维度特定满意度量表得分与忠诚度量表得分以及医院服务质量总体评分之间存在显著正相关,这为该工具的结构效度提供了证据。收敛判别分析进一步支持了结构效度,该分析表明所有7个量表的项目与其总量表得分之间的相关性大于量表项目与它们所不代表的量表总分之间的相关性。对访谈中未涉及的关于医院服务不满意方面的开放性问题进行了分析,以检验该工具的内容效度。结果表明,患者指出了11个项目,其中8个项目被多次提及,2个项目无法归类到该工具所评估的7个维度中。建议添加被多次提及的8个项目,并重新评估修订后工具的可靠性和效度。还建议通过比较不同时间的量表得分来评估重测信度。