Polderman Tinca J C, Derks Eske M, Hudziak Jim J, Verhulst Frank C, Posthuma Daniëlle, Boomsma Dorret I
Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;48(11):1080-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01783.x.
Most behavior checklists for attention problems or attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) such as the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) have a narrow range of scores, focusing on the extent to which problems are present. It has been proposed that measuring attention on a continuum, from positive attention skills to attention problems, will add value to our understanding of ADHD and related problems. The Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD symptoms and Normal behavior scale (SWAN) is such a scale. Items of the SWAN are scored on a seven-point scale, with in the middle 'average behavior' and on the extremes 'far below average' and 'far above average'.
The SWAN and the CBCL were completed by mothers of respectively 560 and 469 12-year-old twin pairs. The SWAN consists of nine DSM-IV items for Attention Deficit (AD) and nine DSM-IV items for Hyperactivity/Impulsivity (HI). The CBCL Attention Problem (AP) scale consists of 11 items, which are rated on a three-point scale.
Children who had a score of zero on the CBCL AP scale can be further differentiated using the SWAN, with variation seen between the average behavior and far above average range. In addition, SWAN scores were normally distributed, rather than kurtotic or skewed as is often seen with other behavioral checklists. The CBCL AP scale and the SWAN-HI and AD scale were strongly influenced by genetic factors (73%, 90% and 82%, respectively). However, there were striking differences in genetic architecture: variation in CBCL AP scores is in large part explained by non-additive genetic influences. Variation in SWAN scores is explained by additive genetic influences only.
Ratings on the SWAN cover the continuum from positive attention skills to attention and hyperactivity problems that define ADHD. Instruments such as the SWAN offer clinicians and researchers the opportunity to examine variation in both strengths and weaknesses in attention skills.
大多数用于评估注意力问题或注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的行为检查表,如儿童行为检查表(CBCL),得分范围较窄,主要关注问题出现的程度。有人提出,从积极的注意力技能到注意力问题,在一个连续体上测量注意力,将有助于我们更好地理解ADHD及相关问题。ADHD症状与正常行为优势与劣势量表(SWAN)就是这样一种量表。SWAN的项目采用七点量表评分,中间为“平均行为”,两端分别为“远低于平均水平”和“远高于平均水平”。
分别由560对和469对12岁双胞胎的母亲完成SWAN和CBCL。SWAN包括9个用于注意力缺陷(AD)的DSM-IV项目和9个用于多动/冲动(HI)的DSM-IV项目。CBCL注意力问题(AP)量表由11个项目组成,采用三点量表评分。
在CBCL AP量表上得分为零的儿童,使用SWAN可以进一步区分,平均行为和远高于平均水平范围之间存在差异。此外,SWAN得分呈正态分布,而不像其他行为检查表那样呈现峰态或偏态分布。CBCL AP量表以及SWAN-HI和AD量表受遗传因素的强烈影响(分别为73%、90%和82%)。然而,遗传结构存在显著差异:CBCL AP得分的变异在很大程度上由非加性遗传影响解释。SWAN得分的变异仅由加性遗传影响解释。
SWAN评分涵盖了从积极的注意力技能到定义ADHD的注意力和多动问题的连续体。像SWAN这样的工具为临床医生和研究人员提供了检查注意力技能优势和劣势两方面变异的机会。