Suppr超能文献

[丙泊酚与咪达唑仑用于氯胺酮复合麻醉在妇科小手术中的比较]

[Diprivan versus midazolam in combined anaesthesia with ketamin for minor gynecological surgery].

作者信息

Tablov V, Tsafarov M, Tablov B, Popov I, Partenov P

出版信息

Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2007;46(3):41-3.

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that diprivan/ketamine (D/K) anesthesia would offer advantages compared to midazolam/ketamine (M/K) in patients undergoing minor gynecological surgery. After patient written consent, 60 healthy women, which were scheduled for elective termination of pregnancy were randomly allocated into two groups. Operating conditions, recovery, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and patient's satisfaction to anesthesia were assessed. Demographic and surgical data were identical in the groups. Immediate recovery was faster with patients given diprivan than midazolam. Patients receiving M/K experienced more PONV in recovery room. D/K is preferable method of anesthesia for ultra-short gynecological procedure compared to M/K because of faster recovery and decreased incidence of PONV.

摘要

我们检验了以下假设

在接受小型妇科手术的患者中,与咪达唑仑/氯胺酮(M/K)相比,丙泊酚/氯胺酮(D/K)麻醉具有优势。在患者书面同意后,将60名计划进行选择性终止妊娠的健康女性随机分为两组。评估了手术条件、恢复情况、疼痛、术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)以及患者对麻醉的满意度。两组的人口统计学和手术数据相同。使用丙泊酚的患者比使用咪达唑仑的患者恢复更快。接受M/K的患者在恢复室经历了更多的PONV。与M/K相比,D/K是超短妇科手术更可取的麻醉方法,因为恢复更快且PONV发生率降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验