Scapellato Maria Luisa, Mastrangelo Giuseppe, Fedeli Ugo, Carrieri Mariella, Maccà Isabella, Scoizzato Luca, Bartolucci Giovanni Battista
Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, University of Padova, Italy.
Neurotoxicology. 2008 Jan;29(1):116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
There is conflicting evidence on the level of anesthetics that impairs neurobehavioral performance, leading to differences in exposure standards (25 or 50 ppm for N(2)O). Thirty-eight operating room nurses and 23 unexposed nurses were asked to provide information on confounding variables: age, gender, years of schooling, alcohol and coffee consumption, smoking, length of work, symptoms (Euroquest) and results of Block Design test. Afterward, all workers were repeatedly examined (on Monday and Friday of a working week, before and after workshift) for stress and arousal (Mood Scale) and complex reaction times (Color Word Vigilance, CWV), the latter being the outcome. Individual exposure was assessed through urinary end-shift concentrations of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and isoflurane. According to the highest value of urinary excretion of N(2)O in the week, exposed workers were subdivided in three groups (<13; > or =13 and <27; and > or = 27 microg/l). The values of 13 and 27 microg/l correspond to environmental concentrations of 25 and 50 ppm, respectively. In order to take into account the pre-existing abilities of exposed and reference workers, and investigate the neurobehavioral changes over time, longitudinal data were analyzed by a two-stage regression model and analysis of variance for repeated measures (MANOVA). The former method, controlling for confounding factors and Monday morning CWV (which conveyed the pre-existing ability of the subjects), showed that, with respect to unexposed nurses, reaction times were significantly (p<0.020) higher only in workers with urinary N(2)O> or = 27 microg/l. Therefore, at MANOVA, all subjects were categorized in two classes (N(2)O urinary concentrations
关于损害神经行为表现的麻醉剂水平,存在相互矛盾的证据,这导致了暴露标准的差异(笑气的暴露标准为25或50 ppm)。38名手术室护士和23名未暴露的护士被要求提供关于混杂变量的信息:年龄、性别、受教育年限、酒精和咖啡摄入量、吸烟情况、工作时长、症状(欧洲问卷)以及方块设计测试结果。之后,对所有工人进行反复检查(在工作周的周一和周五,班前和班后),以评估压力和唤醒程度(情绪量表)以及复杂反应时间(颜色词警觉性测试,CWV),后者作为结果指标。通过尿中下班时笑气(N₂O)和异氟烷的浓度评估个体暴露情况。根据一周内尿中N₂O排泄的最高值,将暴露工人分为三组(<13;≥13且<27;以及≥27 μg/l)。13和27 μg/l的值分别对应环境浓度25和50 ppm。为了考虑暴露工人和对照工人的原有能力,并研究随时间的神经行为变化,采用两阶段回归模型和重复测量方差分析(MANOVA)对纵向数据进行分析。前一种方法,在控制混杂因素和周一早晨的CWV(它反映了受试者的原有能力)后显示,与未暴露的护士相比,只有尿中N₂O≥27 μg/l的工人反应时间显著更高(p<0.020)。因此,在MANOVA中,所有受试者被分为两类(尿中N₂O浓度<或≥27 μg/l),并对CWV结果进行调整,以考虑混杂变量以及与CWV同时测量的压力和唤醒效应。尿中N₂O<27 μg/l的工人在一个工作周内CWV显著降低(表明有学习效应),而尿中N₂O>27 μg/l的工人CWV保持稳定(表明神经行为表现受损)。