Pérez-Losada Marcos, Harp Margaret, Høeg Jens T, Achituv Yair, Jones Diana, Watanabe Hiromi, Crandall Keith A
Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602-5181, USA.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Jan;46(1):328-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.10.004. Epub 2007 Oct 13.
Previous phylogenetic attempts at resolving barnacle evolutionary relationships are few and have relied on limited taxon sampling. Here we combine DNA sequences from three nuclear genes (18S, 28S and H3) and 44 morphological characters collected from 76 thoracican (ingroup) and 15 rhizocephalan (outgroup) species representing almost all the Thoracica families to assess the tempo and mode of barnacle evolution. Using phylogenetic methods of maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference and 14 fossil calibrations, we found that: (1) Iblomorpha form a monophyletic group; (2) pedunculated barnacles without shell plates (Heteralepadomorpha) are not ancestral, but have evolved, at least twice, from plated forms; (3) the ontogenetic pattern with 5-->6-->8-->12+ plates does not reflect Thoracica shell evolution; (4) the traditional asymmetric barnacles (Verrucidae) and the Balanomorpha are each monophyletic and together they form a monophyletic group; (5) asymmetry and loss of a peduncle have evolved twice in the Thoracica, resulting in neither the Verrucomorpha nor the Sessilia forming monophyletic groups in their present definitions; (6) the Scalpellomorpha are not monophyletic; (7) the Thoracica suborders evolved since the Early Carboniferous (340mya) with the final radiation of the Sessilia in the Upper Jurassic (147mya). These results, therefore, reject many of the underlying hypotheses about character evolution in the Cirripedia Thoracica, stimulate a variety of new thoughts on thoracican radiation, and suggest the need for a major rearrangement in thoracican classification based on estimated phylogenetic relationships.
以往在解析藤壶进化关系方面的系统发育研究较少,且所依赖的分类单元采样有限。在此,我们结合了来自三个核基因(18S、28S和H3)的DNA序列以及从76种胸甲类(内类群)和15种根头目(外类群)物种收集的44个形态特征,这些物种几乎涵盖了所有胸甲类科,以评估藤壶进化的节奏和模式。使用最大简约法、最大似然法和贝叶斯推断等系统发育方法以及14个化石校准,我们发现:(1)艾氏藤壶类形成一个单系群;(2)无壳板的有柄藤壶(异茗荷亚目)并非原始类群,而是至少两次从有壳板的形式进化而来;(3)具有5→6→8→12 + 壳板的个体发育模式并不反映胸甲类的壳进化;(4)传统的不对称藤壶(茗荷科)和龟藤壶亚目各自为单系群,它们共同构成一个单系群;(5)不对称和柄的缺失在胸甲类中独立进化了两次,导致茗荷形亚目和无柄类在当前定义下均不构成单系群;(6)铠茗荷亚目并非单系群;(7)胸甲类亚目自石炭纪早期(3.4亿年前)开始进化,无柄类在侏罗纪晚期(1.47亿年前)最终辐射分化。因此,这些结果否定了许多关于胸甲类藤壶特征进化的潜在假设,激发了关于胸甲类辐射分化的各种新思考,并表明需要根据估计的系统发育关系对胸甲类分类进行重大重新调整。