Skapa Petr, Zamecnik Josef, Hamsikova Eva, Salakova Martina, Smahelova Jana, Jandova Kristyna, Robova Helena, Rob Lukas, Tachezy Ruth
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Charles University, 2nd Medical School, Faculty Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Dec;31(12):1834-43. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3180686d10.
The term vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) introduced in 1986 incorporates 3 grades of usual VIN (u-VIN I-III) and the differentiated VIN (d-VIN). Although u-VIN is etiologically associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, d-VIN represents an alternative HPV negative pathway of vulvar carcinogenesis. In 2004, the u-VIN I category was abandoned and u-VIN II and III were merged. Further, an alternative Bethesda-like terminology scheme presenting the term vulvar intraepithelial lesion was proposed recently. To analyze the impact of HPV profiles of vulvar precancerous lesions for their classification and to assess the presumable efficacy of the prophylactic HPV vaccination, 269 vulvar excisions representing lichen sclerosus, lichen simplex chronicus, condylomata acuminata, d-VIN, all grades of u-VIN and squamous cell carcinomas were subjected to the HPV typing by use of GP5+/6+ polymerase chain reaction and reverse line blot hybridization. The results showed different HPV profiles, and also differing frequency of multiple-type HPV infection and the age structure in patients with u-VIN II and III. The biologic heterogeneity within the u-VIN II category was also demonstrated. u-VIN I was distinguished as a rare disorder associated with high-risk HPV infection. We conclude that the original VIN terminology proposed in 1986 seems to be appropriate for the classification of vulvar squamous dysplastic lesions. The spectrum of HPV types found in vulvar squamous cell carcinomas indicates that the efficacy of HPV vaccination in preventing vulvar cancer might be diminished in the studied population, because the recently developed prophylactic vaccines are targeted against a limited number of HPV types.
1986年引入的术语“外阴上皮内瘤变(VIN)”涵盖了3级普通型VIN(u-VIN I-III)和分化型VIN(d-VIN)。虽然u-VIN在病因上与人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染相关,但d-VIN代表了外阴癌发生的另一种HPV阴性途径。2004年,u-VIN I类别被摒弃,u-VIN II和III合并。此外,最近还提出了一种类似贝塞斯达系统的替代术语方案,即使用“外阴上皮内病变”这一术语。为了分析外阴癌前病变的HPV谱对其分类的影响,并评估预防性HPV疫苗接种的可能效果,对269例代表硬化性苔藓、慢性单纯性苔藓、尖锐湿疣、d-VIN、各级u-VIN以及鳞状细胞癌的外阴切除术标本,采用GP5+/6+聚合酶链反应和反向线印迹杂交进行HPV分型。结果显示,u-VIN II和III患者的HPV谱不同,多重HPV感染频率和年龄结构也不同。同时也证实了u-VIN II类别内的生物学异质性。u-VIN I被认定为一种与高危HPV感染相关的罕见疾病。我们得出结论,1986年提出的原始VIN术语似乎适用于外阴鳞状发育异常病变的分类。外阴鳞状细胞癌中发现的HPV类型谱表明,在所研究的人群中,HPV疫苗接种预防外阴癌的效果可能会降低,因为最近研发的预防性疫苗针对的HPV类型有限。