Foggs Michael B
Advocate Health Centers, Advocate Health Care, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA.
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2008 Jan;14(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3282f30234.
The purpose of this article is to review how optimal asthma management can be applied in a variety of clinical settings that are used to care for high-risk, urban asthma patients, especially those who live in the inner city, utilizing the 2007 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/National Asthma Education Prevention Program 'Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma', and adapting them to be applied in a variety of urban clinical settings, independent of practice infrastructure.
Previous asthma guidelines stressed asthma severity classification. A renewed focus on asthma control has led to better asthma outcomes. Consequently, it was deemed necessary to establish a new asthma paradigm that characterizes both asthma severity and control within the context of current impairment and future risk. This new paradigm can be effectively applied to high-risk, inner-city asthma patients, while allowing for individualization of care within systems of varied healthcare delivery infrastructures.
Assessment of asthma severity and control, with special emphasis on literacy and ethno-cultural beliefs and philosophies, will facilitate appropriate adaptations of long-term asthma management to provide optimal outcomes in urban asthmatics. It is essential to anticipate the worst-case, while planning for the best-case scenario.
本文旨在探讨如何依据2007年美国国立心肺血液研究所/国家哮喘教育与预防计划的“哮喘诊断与管理指南”,将最佳哮喘管理应用于各类用于照料高危城市哮喘患者(尤其是那些居住在市中心的患者)的临床环境中,并对其进行调整以适用于各种城市临床环境,而不受实践基础设施的限制。
以往的哮喘指南强调哮喘严重程度分级。对哮喘控制的重新关注带来了更好的哮喘治疗效果。因此,有必要建立一种新的哮喘模式,在当前损伤和未来风险的背景下对哮喘严重程度和控制情况进行描述。这种新模式可以有效地应用于高危市中心哮喘患者,同时在不同医疗服务提供基础设施系统内实现个体化治疗。
评估哮喘严重程度和控制情况,特别关注文化素养以及种族文化信仰和理念,将有助于对长期哮喘管理进行适当调整,从而为城市哮喘患者提供最佳治疗效果。在规划最佳情况的同时,预估最坏情况至关重要。