Suppr超能文献

出院小结中的简短证据摘要对从业者出院用药依从性的影响。一项整群随机对照试验。

Impact of short evidence summaries in discharge letters on adherence of practitioners to discharge medication. A cluster-randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Kunz R, Wegscheider K, Guyatt G, Zielinski W, Rakowsky N, Donner-Banzhoff N, Müller-Lissner S

机构信息

Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Hebelstrasse 10, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec;16(6):456-61. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020305.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

International concern about quality of medical care has led to intensive study of interventions to ensure care is consistent with best evidence. Simple, inexpensive, feasible and effective interventions remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the impact of one-sentence evidence summaries appended to consultants' letters to primary care practitioners on adherence of the practitioners to recommendations made by the consultants regarding medication for patients with chronic medical problems.

DESIGN

Cluster-randomised trial.

SETTING

Secondary/primary care interface (urban district hospital/referral practices).

PARTICIPANTS

178 practices received one or more discharge letters with evidence summaries. The 66 practices in the intervention group provided feedback on 172 letters, and the 56 practices in the control group provided feedback on 96 letters.

RESULTS

Appending an evidence summary to discharge letters resulted in a decrease in non-adherence to discharge medication from 29.6% to 18.5% (difference adjusted for underlying medical condition 12.5%; p = 0.039). Among the five possible reasons for discontinuing discharge medication, the evidence summaries seemed to have the largest impact on budget-related reasons for discontinuation (2.6% in the intervention versus 10.7% in the control group (p = 0.052)). Most clinicians (72%) were enthusiastic about continuing receiving evidence summaries with discharge letters in routine care.

CONCLUSIONS

The one-sentence evidence summary is a simple, inexpensive, well-accepted intervention that may improve primary care practitioners' adherence to evidence-based consultant recommendations.

摘要

背景

国际上对医疗质量的关注促使人们深入研究各种干预措施,以确保医疗服务符合最佳证据。简单、廉价、可行且有效的干预措施仍然有限。

目的

我们研究了在给基层医疗从业者的会诊信中附加一句话证据总结,对从业者遵循会诊医生关于慢性病患者用药建议的影响。

设计

整群随机试验。

地点

二级/基层医疗接口(市区医院/转诊诊所)。

参与者

178家诊所收到了一封或多封附有证据总结的出院信。干预组的66家诊所对172封信提供了反馈,对照组的56家诊所对96封信提供了反馈。

结果

在出院信中附加证据总结使出院用药的不依从率从29.6%降至18.5%(根据基础疾病调整后的差异为12.5%;p = 0.039)。在停药的五个可能原因中,证据总结似乎对与预算相关的停药原因影响最大(干预组为2.6%,对照组为10.7%(p = 0.052))。大多数临床医生(72%)热衷于在常规护理中继续收到随出院信附上的证据总结。

结论

一句话证据总结是一种简单、廉价且广受欢迎的干预措施,可能会提高基层医疗从业者对循证会诊建议的依从性。

相似文献

3
Communication between general practitioners and consultants: what should their letters contain?
BMJ. 1992 Mar 28;304(6830):821-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6830.821.
4
Nurses engaging with referral letters and discharge summaries: A qualitative study.
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Jun;33(6):2309-2323. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17054. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
6
General practitioner and hospital letters.
Ulster Med J. 1995 Apr;64(1):46-50.
9
Outcomes of referrals from general practice.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1995 Dec;13(4):287-93. doi: 10.3109/02813439508996777.
10
[Epicrises from a department of medical gastroenterology].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1991 Jun 24;153(26):1868-70.

引用本文的文献

2
Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 31;8(8):CD004398. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub4.
3
Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 18;12(12):CD001174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001174.pub4.
4
Hospital discharge: What are the problems, information needs and objectives of community pharmacists? A mixed method approach.
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Jul-Sep;15(3):1046. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.03.1046. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
7
Informational needs of general practitioners regarding discharge medication: content, timing and pharmacotherapeutic advice.
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Apr;32(2):172-8. doi: 10.1007/s11096-009-9363-3. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
8
How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug 8;9:143. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-143.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Feb;8(6):iii-iv, 1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta8060.
2
Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Med J Aust. 2003 Mar 3;178(5):217-22. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05166.x.
3
Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study.
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1100-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1100.
5
Promoting evidence-based medicine in general practice-the impact of academic detailing.
Fam Pract. 2001 Aug;18(4):364-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.4.364.
6
Just in time information for clinicians: a questionnaire evaluation of the ATTRACT project.
BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):529-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.529.
8
Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000409. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000409.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验