Suppr超能文献

G蛋白偶联受体脱敏的激动剂选择性机制。

Agonist-selective mechanisms of GPCR desensitization.

作者信息

Kelly E, Bailey C P, Henderson G

机构信息

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;153 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S379-88. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707604. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

Abstract

The widely accepted model of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) regulation describes a system where the agonist-activated receptors couple to G proteins to induce a cellular response, and are subsequently phosphorylated by a family of kinases called the G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). The GRK-phosphorylated receptor then acts as a substrate for the binding of a family of proteins called arrestins, which uncouple the receptor and G protein so desensitizing the agonist-induced response. Other kinases, principally the second messenger-dependent protein kinases, are also known to play a role in the desensitization of many GPCR responses. It is now clear that there are subtle and complex interactions between GRKs and second messenger-dependent protein kinases in the regulation of GPCR function. Functional selectivity describes the ability of agonists to stabilize different active conformations of the same GPCR. With regard to desensitization, distinct agonist-activated conformations of a GPCR could undergo different molecular mechanisms of desensitization. An example of this is the mu opioid receptor (MOPr), where the agonists morphine and [D-Ala(2),N-MePhe(4),Gly-ol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO) induce desensitization of the MOPr by different mechanisms, largely protein kinase C (PKC)- or GRK-dependent, respectively. This can be best explained by supposing that these two agonists stabilize distinct conformations of the MOPr, which are nevertheless able to couple to the relevant G-proteins and produce similar responses, yet are sufficiently different to trigger different regulatory processes. There is evidence that other GPCRs also undergo agonist-selective desensitization, but the full therapeutic consequences of this phenomenon await further detailed study.

摘要

G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)调控的广泛接受模型描述了这样一个系统:激动剂激活的受体与G蛋白偶联以诱导细胞反应,随后被称为G蛋白偶联受体激酶(GRK)的激酶家族磷酸化。GRK磷酸化的受体随后作为一类称为阻遏蛋白的蛋白质结合的底物,这些阻遏蛋白使受体与G蛋白解偶联,从而使激动剂诱导的反应脱敏。其他激酶,主要是第二信使依赖性蛋白激酶,也已知在许多GPCR反应的脱敏中起作用。现在很清楚,在GPCR功能的调控中,GRK和第二信使依赖性蛋白激酶之间存在微妙而复杂的相互作用。功能选择性描述了激动剂稳定同一GPCR不同活性构象的能力。关于脱敏,GPCR不同的激动剂激活构象可能经历不同的脱敏分子机制。一个例子是μ阿片受体(MOPr),其中激动剂吗啡和[D-Ala(2),N-MePhe(4),Gly-ol(5)]脑啡肽(DAMGO)通过不同机制诱导MOPr脱敏,分别主要依赖蛋白激酶C(PKC)或GRK。这可以通过假设这两种激动剂稳定MOPr的不同构象来最好地解释,这些构象尽管能够与相关G蛋白偶联并产生相似的反应,但却足够不同以触发不同的调节过程。有证据表明其他GPCR也经历激动剂选择性脱敏,但这一现象的全部治疗后果有待进一步详细研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验