Suppr超能文献

系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)中的血管炎——外周血单个核细胞活化及内皮功能障碍程度的评估:初步报告

Vasculitis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)--assessment of peripheral blood mononuclear cell activation and the degree of endothelial dysfunction: initial report.

作者信息

Kluz Joanna, Kopeć Wacław, Jakobsche Urszula, Prajs Iwona, Adamiec Rajmund

机构信息

Department of Angiology, Arterial Hypertension, and Diabetology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

出版信息

Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2007 Dec 3;61:725-35.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory-immune changes in the vascular endothelium are one of the main factors initiating vessel wall damage. Enhanced expression of endothelial adhesion molecules and their receptors on the surface of circulating leukocytes seems to play an important role in the pathogenesis of vasculitis. Increasing evidence indicates endothelial cell activation/damage in SLE. In patients with SLE complicated by vasculitis, enhanced expression of integrin activation markers on the surface of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) has been reported. It seems relevant to assess the mechanisms of inflammatory response involving PBMCs and endothelial cells at particular stages of SLE microangiopathy.

AIM

The main aim was to assess the surface expressions of the integrin adhesion molecules VLA-4 (CD49d) and LFA-1 (CD11a) on PBMCs as well as the number of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) in patients with SLE and complications related to inflammatory microangiopathy and to determine whether these parameters vary depending on disease activity.

PATIENTS

Twenty-nine women with SLE (mean age: 38.72+/-10.23 years) were divided into subgroup I: those with severe disease activity according to the modified disease activity index SLEDAI, characterized by the presence of inflammatory microangiopathy-related complications such as systemic central nervous system affection and/or vasculitis and/or nephritis (15 women, mean age: 38.33+/-11.02 years), and subgroup II: patients with mild or moderate disease activity according to SLEDAI and without vascular complications (14 women, mean age: 39.14+/-9.72 years).

METHODS

Expressions of VLA-4 and LFA-1 on the surface of peripheral blood lymphocytes and monocytes were assessed by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies. CECs (a marker of endothelial damage) were isolated from peripheral blood with anti-CD146(S-Endo 1)-coated immunomagnetic Dynabeads. Tests for the lupus anticoagulant, antinuclear antibody, anti-dsDNA, and anticardiolipin antibody were performed in every study subject by ELISA. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and serum levels of fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, the complement components C3 and C4, urea, creatinine, and uric acid were determined by standard methods. Peripheral blood counts and a general urinalysis were also performed.

RESULTS

The mean CEC count was significantly higher in SLE patients than in the control group (15.29+/-12.10 vs. 3.08+/-1.46 cells/ml, p<0.001). CEC counts was notably elevated in patient subgroup II compared with the control group (9.14+/-5.16 vs. 3.08+/-1.46 cells/ml, p<0.05) and in subgroup I compared with subgroup II (21.03+/-13.96 vs. 9.14+/-5.19 cell/ml, p<0.05). In patients with severe SLE flares, CEC count visibly correlated with disease activity assessed by SLEDAI score (R=0.92, p<0.001). The expressions of VLA-4 and LFA-1 on peripheral blood lymphocytes in both patient subgroups were significantly higher than in the control group (subgroup I vs. controls: 1.70+/-1.56 vs. 0.39+/-0.26%, p<0.05, and 1.97+/-2.60 vs. 0.67+/-0.83%, p<0.05; subgroup II vs. controls: 1.71+/-1.04 vs. 0.39+/-0.26%, p<0.001, and 3.32+/-2.48 vs. 0.67+/-0.83%, p<0.05, for VLA-4 and LFA-1, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two subgroups of patients (1.70+/-1.56 vs. 1.71+/-1.04%, p>0.05, and 1.97+/-2.60 vs. 3.32+/-2.48%, p>0.05, respectively). Similarly, the surface expression of LFA-1 on circulating monocytes in patients in both subgroups was notably enhanced over that of the control group (91.44+/-16.00 vs. 84.95+/-19.86%, p<0.05, and 90.11+/-10.34 vs. 84.95+/-19.86%, p<0.05, in subgroups I and II respectively) and was comparable in both subgroups of patients (91.44+/-16.00 vs. 90.11+/-10.33%, p>0.05). The surface expression of VLA-4 on peripheral blood monocytes was considerably higher in patients with severe disease activity than in the control group and in patients with less active disease (77.10+/-13.56 vs. 64.90+/-19.13%, p<0.05, and 77.10+/-13.56 vs. 63.40+/-20.95%, p<0.05, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between patients with mild or moderate disease activity and the control group (63.40+/-20.95 vs. 64.90+/-19.13%, p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

  1. The number of CECs increases in the course of SLE and correlates with disease activity, indicating progressive endothelial damage.2) The expressions of VLA-4 and LFA-1 on the surface of peripheral blood lymphocytes as well as that of LFA-1 on circulating monocytes are enhanced in SLE patients regardless of disease activity. 3) The expression of VLA-4 on the surface of circulating monocytes is enhanced only in patients with severe disease activity, characterized by the presence of complications connected with inflammatory microangiopathy, which may indicate that the upregulation of VLA-4 expression in monocytes plays a leading role in the pathogenesis of vasculitis in SLE.
摘要

背景

血管内皮的炎症免疫变化是引发血管壁损伤的主要因素之一。循环白细胞表面内皮黏附分子及其受体的表达增强似乎在血管炎的发病机制中起重要作用。越来越多的证据表明系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)存在内皮细胞活化/损伤。在合并血管炎的SLE患者中,外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)表面整合素活化标志物的表达增强已有报道。评估SLE微血管病变特定阶段涉及PBMC和内皮细胞的炎症反应机制似乎具有相关性。

目的

主要目的是评估SLE患者及合并炎症性微血管病变相关并发症患者外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)上整合素黏附分子VLA - 4(CD49d)和LFA - 1(CD11a)的表面表达以及循环内皮细胞(CEC)的数量,并确定这些参数是否因疾病活动度而异。

患者

29例SLE女性患者(平均年龄:38.72±10.23岁)分为I组:根据改良疾病活动指数SLEDAI判断为疾病活动严重,其特征为存在与炎症性微血管病变相关的并发症,如系统性中枢神经系统受累和/或血管炎和/或肾炎(15例女性,平均年龄:38.33±11.02岁);II组:根据SLEDAI判断为疾病活动轻度或中度且无血管并发症(14例女性,平均年龄:39.14±9.72岁)。

方法

使用单克隆抗体通过流式细胞术评估外周血淋巴细胞和单核细胞表面VLA - 4和LFA - 1的表达。用抗CD146(S - Endo 1)包被的免疫磁珠从外周血中分离CEC(内皮损伤标志物)。通过ELISA对每个研究对象进行狼疮抗凝物、抗核抗体、抗双链DNA和抗心磷脂抗体检测。采用标准方法测定红细胞沉降率以及纤维蛋白原、C反应蛋白、补体成分C3和C4、尿素、肌酐和尿酸的血清水平。还进行外周血细胞计数和尿常规检查。

结果

SLE患者的平均CEC计数显著高于对照组(15.29±12.10 vs. 3.08±1.46个细胞/毫升,p<0.001)。与对照组相比,II组患者的CEC计数显著升高(9.14±5.16 vs. 3.08±1.46个细胞/毫升,p<0.05),I组与II组相比也显著升高(21.03±13.96 vs. 9.14±5.19个细胞/毫升,p<0.05)。在SLE严重发作的患者中,CEC计数与通过SLEDAI评分评估的疾病活动度明显相关(R = 0.92,p<0.001)。两个患者亚组外周血淋巴细胞上VLA - 4和LFA - 1的表达均显著高于对照组(I组与对照组:VLA - 4分别为1.70±1.56% vs. 0.39±0.26%,p<0.05;LFA - 1分别为1.97±2.60% vs. 0.67±0.83%,p<0.05;II组与对照组:VLA - 4分别为1.71±1.04% vs. 0.39±0.26%,p<0.001;LFA - 1分别为3.32±2.48% vs. 0.67±0.83%,p<0.05)。两个患者亚组之间无显著差异(分别为1.70±1.56% vs. 1.71±1.04%,p>0.05;1.97±2.60% vs. 3.32±2.48%,p>0.05)。同样,两个亚组患者循环单核细胞上LFA - 1的表面表达均显著高于对照组(I组为91.44±16.00% vs. 84.95±19.86%,p<0.05;II组为90.11±10.34% vs. 84.95±19.86%,p<0.05),且两个患者亚组之间具有可比性(91.44±16.00% vs. 90.11±10.33%,p>0.05)。疾病活动严重的患者外周血单核细胞上VLA - 4的表面表达显著高于对照组以及疾病活动较轻的患者(分别为77.10±13.56% vs. 64.90±19.13%,p<0.05;77.10±13.56% vs. 63.40±20.95%,p<0.05)。然而,疾病活动轻度或中度的患者与对照组之间无显著差异(63.40±20.95% vs. 64.90±19.13%,p>0.05)。

结论

1)SLE病程中CEC数量增加且与疾病活动度相关,表明内皮损伤进展。2)SLE患者外周血淋巴细胞表面VLA - 4和LFA - 1以及循环单核细胞表面LFA - 1的表达增强,与疾病活动度无关。3)仅在疾病活动严重且存在与炎症性微血管病变相关并发症的患者中,循环单核细胞表面VLA - 4的表达增强,这可能表明单核细胞中VLA - 4表达上调在SLE血管炎发病机制中起主导作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验