Milgrom Jeannette, Gemmill Alan W, Bilszta Justin L, Hayes Barbara, Barnett Bryanne, Brooks Janette, Ericksen Jennifer, Ellwood David, Buist Anne
Department of Psychology, School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Affect Disord. 2008 May;108(1-2):147-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.014. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
This study measured antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression in the Australian population, both singly and in combination. Risk factor data were gathered antenatally and depressive symptoms measured via the beyondblue National Postnatal Depression Program, a large prospective cohort study into perinatal mental health, conducted in all six states of Australia, and in the Australian Capital Territory, between 2002 and 2005.
Pregnant women were screened for symptoms of postnatal depression at antenatal clinics in maternity services around Australia using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and a psychosocial risk factor questionnaire that covered key demographic and psychosocial information.
From a total of 40,333 participants, we collected antenatal EPDS data from 35,374 women and 3144 of these had a score >12 (8.9%). Subsequently, efforts were made to follow-up 22,968 women with a postnatal EPDS. Of 12,361 women who completed postnatal EPDS forms, 925 (7.5%) had an EPDS score >12. Antenatal depression together with a prior history of depression and a low level of partner support were the strongest independent antenatal predictors of a postnatal EPDS score >12.
The two main limitations of the study were the use of the EPDS (a self-report screening tool) as the measure of depressive symptoms rather than a clinical diagnosis, and the rate of attrition between antenatal screening and the collection of postnatal follow-up data.
Antenatal depressive symptoms appear to be as common as postnatal depressive symptoms. Previous depression, current depression/anxiety, and low partner support are found to be key antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression in this large prospective cohort, consistent with existing meta-analytic surveys. Current depression/anxiety (and to some extent social support) may be amenable to change and can therefore be targeted for intervention.
本研究对澳大利亚人群产后抑郁的产前风险因素进行了单独及综合测量。风险因素数据于产前收集,抑郁症状通过“超越忧郁”全国产后抑郁项目进行测量,该项目是一项针对围产期心理健康的大型前瞻性队列研究,于2002年至2005年在澳大利亚所有六个州及澳大利亚首都地区开展。
在澳大利亚各地产科服务的产前诊所,使用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和一份涵盖关键人口统计学和心理社会信息的心理社会风险因素问卷,对孕妇进行产后抑郁症状筛查。
在总共40333名参与者中,我们收集了35374名女性的产前EPDS数据,其中3144名得分>12(8.9%)。随后,对22968名产后接受EPDS检查的女性进行了随访。在12361名填写了产后EPDS表格的女性中,925名(7.5%)的EPDS得分>12。产前抑郁以及既往抑郁病史和伴侣支持水平低是产后EPDS得分>12的最强独立产前预测因素。
该研究的两个主要局限性在于使用EPDS(一种自我报告筛查工具)作为抑郁症状的测量方法而非临床诊断,以及产前筛查与产后随访数据收集之间的损耗率。
产前抑郁症状似乎与产后抑郁症状一样常见。在这个大型前瞻性队列中,既往抑郁、当前抑郁/焦虑以及伴侣支持水平低被发现是产后抑郁的关键产前风险因素,这与现有的荟萃分析调查结果一致。当前抑郁/焦虑(以及在一定程度上的社会支持)可能是可以改变的,因此可以作为干预目标。