Jablonka Eva, Lamb Marion J
Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Aug;30(4):353-65; discusssion 365-89. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07002221.
In his theory of evolution, Darwin recognized that the conditions of life play a role in the generation of hereditary variations, as well as in their selection. However, as evolutionary theory was developed further, heredity became identified with genetics, and variation was seen in terms of combinations of randomly generated gene mutations. We argue that this view is now changing, because it is clear that a notion of hereditary variation that is based solely on randomly varying genes that are unaffected by developmental conditions is an inadequate basis for evolutionary theories. Such a view not only fails to provide satisfying explanations of many evolutionary phenomena, it also makes assumptions that are not consistent with the data that are emerging from disciplines ranging from molecular biology to cultural studies. These data show that the genome is far more responsive to the environment than previously thought, and that not all transmissible variation is underlain by genetic differences. In Evolution in Four Dimensions (2005) we identify four types of inheritance (genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbol-based), each of which can provide variations on which natural selection will act. Some of these variations arise in response to developmental conditions, so there are Lamarckian aspects to evolution. We argue that a better insight into evolutionary processes will result from recognizing that transmitted variations that are not based on DNA differences have played a role. This is particularly true for understanding the evolution of human behavior, where all four dimensions of heredity have been important.
在其进化论中,达尔文认识到生活条件在遗传变异的产生以及变异的选择过程中都发挥着作用。然而,随着进化理论的进一步发展,遗传被等同于遗传学,变异则被视为随机产生的基因突变组合。我们认为这种观点如今正在发生变化,因为很明显,仅基于不受发育条件影响的随机变异基因的遗传变异概念,对于进化理论而言是一个不充分的基础。这种观点不仅无法对许多进化现象给出令人满意的解释,还做出了与从分子生物学到文化研究等众多学科所涌现的数据不一致的假设。这些数据表明,基因组对环境的响应比之前认为的要灵敏得多,而且并非所有可遗传变异都由基因差异作为基础。在《四维进化》(2005年)一书中,我们确定了四种遗传类型(基因遗传、表观遗传、行为遗传和基于符号的遗传),每一种都能提供可供自然选择作用的变异。其中一些变异是对发育条件的响应而产生的,所以进化存在拉马克式的一面。我们认为,认识到并非基于DNA差异的可遗传变异发挥了作用,将能更深入地洞察进化过程。这在理解人类行为的进化时尤为正确,因为遗传的所有四个维度都很重要。