Suppr超能文献

美国泌尿外科学会东南部分会年会(1996 - 2005年)上发表的摘要的研究特征。

Study characteristics of abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the southeastern section of the American Urological Association (1996-2005).

作者信息

Fesperman Susan F, West C Shawn, Bischoff Carl J, Algood Chester B, Vieweg Johannes, Dahm Philipp

机构信息

University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):667-71; discussion 671-2. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.070. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We determined study characteristics, authorship and institutional origin of studies presented in abstract form at the Southeastern Section of the American Urological Association annual meetings and identified predictors of full text publication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All abstracts of poster and podium presentations from the Southeastern Section of the American Urological Association annual meetings from 1996 to 2005 were reviewed. A standardized evaluation form was developed and tested in 2 subsets of 50 abstracts, and then applied by 2 individual reviewers with specific coding instructions. Predictor variables analyzed included study origin, design, topic, domain, presentation form, number of patients, reporting of statistical analysis and gender. Univariate and multivariate analysis was applied using SPSS version 14.0.

RESULTS

A total of 1,195 abstracts were found eligible for review. The mean number of abstracts presented per year was 120 +/- 16 (range 107 to 146). In clinical studies (1,068) approximately three-quarters of the abstracts reported case series (801, 75.0%). Cohort studies accounted for 11.2% of the abstracts and 4.0% were randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Median followup was 64 months (range 17 to 126) and the overall publication rate was 33.5%. First and senior female authorship were identified in 6.2% (74) and 5.4% (64) of abstracts presented, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of studies presented at the Southeastern Section of the American Urological Association annual meetings continue to represent small case series that may not be well suited to guide clinical decision making. Only a third of studies are subsequently published in the peer reviewed literature. The percentage of abstracts with female authorship remains low suggesting that increased efforts to involve women in urological research are indicated.

摘要

目的

我们确定了在美国泌尿外科学会年会东南部会议上以摘要形式发表的研究的特征、作者情况和机构来源,并确定了全文发表的预测因素。

材料与方法

回顾了1996年至2005年美国泌尿外科学会年会东南部会议上所有海报展示和讲台展示的摘要。制定了一份标准化评估表,并在两个包含50篇摘要的子集中进行了测试,然后由两名具有特定编码说明的独立评审员应用。分析的预测变量包括研究来源、设计、主题、领域、展示形式、患者数量、统计分析报告和性别。使用SPSS 14.0版进行单变量和多变量分析。

结果

共发现1195篇摘要符合评审条件。每年提交的摘要平均数量为120±16篇(范围为107至146篇)。在临床研究(1068篇)中,约四分之三的摘要报告了病例系列(801篇,75.0%)。队列研究占摘要的11.2%,4.0%为随机对照试验或系统评价/荟萃分析。中位随访时间为64个月(范围为17至126个月),总体发表率为33.5%。分别有6.2%(74篇)和5.4%(64篇)的摘要确定有第一作者和资深女性作者。

结论

在美国泌尿外科学会年会东南部会议上发表的大多数研究仍然是小型病例系列,可能不太适合指导临床决策。只有三分之一的研究随后发表在同行评审文献中。女性作者撰写的摘要比例仍然较低,这表明需要加大力度让女性参与泌尿学研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验